Table 1.
Current healthcare financing arrangements, coverage, and benefit in China
Three social health insurance schemes | Direct subsidizing of public providers | Medical financial assistance | Free healthcare | Other (private) insurance | Out of pocket (direct payment for care as needed) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEBMI | RCMS | URBMI | ||||||
Beneficiaries | Formal sector workers | Farmers | Urban residents not covered by the UEBMI | All citizens | Poor households with catastrophic health expenses or recognized recipients of China’s social security payments | Public sector employees and special groups such as retired military and Party cadres | Voluntary purchasers of private insurance | Persons not covered by another scheme or having to choose a different health provider (includes many migrant workers) |
Population coverage | 14.8% | 69.5% | 9.5% | All citizens | 809 million incidents funded in 2011 | 0.7% | 0.3% | 5.2% (excludes most migrant workers) |
Benefit covered | Outpatient (OP) and inpatient (IP) | Mainly IP, but some counties experiment to cover some care for OPs (e.g., treatment of chronic diseases) | Mainly IP, but some cities experiment to cover some care for OPs (e.g., treatment of chronic diseases) | All services | IP incurring catastrophic cost to individuals | OP and IP | OP and IP | |
Co-payment arrangement | Practices vary across regions; co-payment occurs for (1) expenses below scheme thresholds and also above ceilings, (2) expenses on high-end or special services excluded from schemes, and (3) the percentage not reimbursable for different services | N.A. | Practices vary cross regions | Very minimal | Varies cross schemes | 100% | ||
OP roughly 30–50%; IP: 10–20% | IP roughly 50–60% | IP roughly 60–70% |
Source: Authors’ own compilation; figures from the 2012 China Health Statistics Digest (Ministry of Health 2012b)