Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;35(2):123–137. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00589-0

Table 2.

Association of baseline total bilirubin with incident NAFLD as measured by FLI

Total bilirubin level (µmol/l) Events/total Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value
Per 1 SD increase 434/3824 0.72 (0.64 to 0.80) < 0.001 0.78 (0.69 to 0.87) < 0.001 0.77 (0.69 to 0.87) < 0.001 0.82 (0.73 to 0.92) 0.001
T1 (0.95–6) 208/1627 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
T2 (7, 8) 116/1024 0.70 (0.55 to 0.90) 0.006 0.85 (0.65 to 1.10) 0.209 0.85 (0.66 to 1.11) 0.232 0.92 (0.71 to 1.20) 0.536
T3 (≥ 9) 110/1173 0.51 (0.39 to 0.66) < 0.001 0.62 (0.47 to 0.81) < 0.001 0.61 (0.47 to 0.80) < 0.001 0.69 (0.52 to 0.91) 0.008

2420 participants with prevalent NAFLD as measured by FLI were excluded

CI confidence interval, FLI fatty liver index, NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, OR odds ratio, SD standard deviation, T tertile

Model 1: Age and sex

Model 2: Model 1 plus smoking status, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Model 3: Model 2 plus alcohol consumption, glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and loge urinary albumin excretion

Model 4: Model 3 plus loge high-sensitivity C-reactive protein