Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 7;8(1):16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2019.09.004

Table 2.

Pathological and oncological outcomes in men received LRP or RARP.

LRP (n = 250) RARP (n = 450) Pvalue
Gleason score (%) 6 71 (28.4) 132 (29.3) 0.173
7 147 (58.8) 238 (52.9)
8–10 32 (12.8) 80 (17.8)
Pathological T stage (%) 0 0 (0) 1 (0.2) N.A.
2a 27 (10.8) 41 (9.1) 0.276
2b 42 (16.8) 69 (18.3) 0.342
2c 120 (48.0) 201 (44.7) 0.396
3a 45 (18.0) 111 (24.7) 0.025
3b 14 (5.6) 26 (5.8) 0.535
4 2 (0.8) 1 (0.1) 0.293
Lymphovascular invasion (%) 0 182 (72.8) 272 (60.4) 0.001
1 68 (27.2) 178 (49.6)
Perineural invasion 0 102 (40.8) 130 (28.9) 0.001
1 148 (59.2) 320 (71.1)
N stage (%) 0 246 (98.4) 419 (93.1) 0.002
Positive surgical margin (%) Total 78 (31.2) 93 (20.7) 0.002
BCR (%) 53 (21.2) 46 (10.2) <0.0001
Salvage therapy RT 3 16
ADT 16 14
RT + ADT 9 12
Surveillance 0 0

LRP, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; RARP, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; BCR, biochemical recurrence; RT, radiation therapy; ADT, androgen deprivation therapy.