Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 8;8(1):10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.01.001

Table 3.

The relationship between postoperative histopathological data and Prostate-Imaging Reporting and Data Scoring System scores.

Variable PIRADS score
P
2 3 4 5
Age 65 (64-69) 65.5 (57-74) 66 (50-76) 66 (53-86) 0.999
Tumor volume (ml) 0.58 (0.50-6.25) 1.00 (0.10-8.42) 1.32 (0.10-23.50) 4.3 (0.20-19.97) <0.001
Primary Gleason grade 3 (3-4) 3 (3-4) 3 (3-5) 4 (3-5) <0.001
Secondary Gleason grade 3 (3-4) 4 (3-5) 4 (3-5) 4 (3-5) 0.083
Tertiary Gleason grade Ø 2.5 (2-5) 3 (1-5) 3 (1-5) 0.801
Total Gleason score
6 4 (80%) 14 (70%) 22 (42%) 14 (28%) <0.001
7 1 (20%) 6 (30%) 21 (39%) 22 (45%)
8 - - 7 (14%) 6 (12%)
9 - - 3 (5%) 5 (10%)
10 - - - 2 (5%)
Surgical margin 2.4% 14.6% 31.7% 51.2% 0.234
Extracapsular extension 0% 4.9% 26.8% 68.3% <0.001
Perineural invasion 60% 65% 64.7% 79.2% 0.379
Lymphovascular invasion Ø Ø Ø 100% 0.032
Seminal vesicle invasion Ø Ø 15.4% 84.6% 0.007
Number of dissected lymph nodes Ø 11.5% 36.5% 51.9% 0.026
Number of tumor positive lymph nodes Ø 100% 89.5% 81.5% 0.611

PIRADS, Prostate-Imaging Reporting and Data Scoring System. Significant p values are given in bold.