Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 30;10(1):010406. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010406

Table 7.

Multivariate results for all men*


Study arm
Baseline % or mean
Endline % or mean
aOR/ 95% CI
P-value
coeff
lower
upper
Primary outcomes:
Physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence with main partner
Control
19.7%
21.4%





Intervention
31.7%
34.7%
1.02
0.72
1.45
0.89
Acceptability of wife beating (number of reasons endorsed as justifications, range 0-5)
Control
0.92
0.91





Intervention
0.92
1.03
0.09
-0.10
0.29
0.34
Actions to support victims of gender-based violence or combat gender-based violence (range 0-12)
Control
7.72
7.58





Intervention
7.60
7.29
-0.13
-0.65
0.40
0.64
Secondary outcomes:







Sources of information on IPV and number of times heard (range 0-36)
Control
20.4
21.9





Intervention
21.3
22.0
-0.70
-2.15
0.76
0.35
Other outcomes measures (exploratory):
Physical intimate partner violence, main partnership
Control
22.5%
24.1%





Intervention
30.2%
35.5%
1.14
0.81
1.61
0.44
Forced or coerced sex with main partner
Control
16.7%
17.3%





Intervention
27.3%
29.8%
1.08
0.74
1.55
0.70
Economic abuse with main partner
Control
33.2%
34.1%





Intervention
34.6%
40.9%
1.23
0.90
1.69
0.19
Children in household witnessing IPV
Control
31.7%
28.7%




(N = 470 baseline, N = 476 household with children under 18, who reported physical or sexual IPV, and did not respond “don't know” regarding child witnessing)

Intervention
32.8%
40.1%
1.66
0.93
2.94
0.09
Support for women working outside the home (range -4 to +4)
Control
0.97
0.84




Intervention 0.96 0.74 -0.12 -0.43 0.19 0.45

aOR – adjusted odds ratio, CI – confidence interval, IPV – intimate partner violence

*All models control for age, education, and asset score.