Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 3;3(4):e202064. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2064

Table 2. Meta-analyzed Sensitivity and Specificity for Applications Collectively and Individually.

Application Score, % (95% CI)
Sensitivity Specificity
Cardiio Rhythm mobile 93.5 (89.2-96.2) 94.8 (88.3-97.8)
FibriCheck 96.9 (94.1-98.4) 96.0 (86.6-98.9)
Preventicusa 92.9 (88.1-95.8) 98.7 (84.3-99.9)
PULSE-SMARTb 97.1 (91.4-99.1) 93.4 (87.3-96.7)
Alla 94.2 (92.2-95.7) 95.8 (92.4-97.7)
a

This analysis does not include the data from Krivoshei et al,27 which used an imperfect reference standard.

b

Only 1 study used this application, so the presented sensitivity and specificity were not meta-analyzed. The rest of the data are the meta-analyzed estimates.