Table 2. Meta-analyzed Sensitivity and Specificity for Applications Collectively and Individually.
| Application | Score, % (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Specificity | |
| Cardiio Rhythm mobile | 93.5 (89.2-96.2) | 94.8 (88.3-97.8) |
| FibriCheck | 96.9 (94.1-98.4) | 96.0 (86.6-98.9) |
| Preventicusa | 92.9 (88.1-95.8) | 98.7 (84.3-99.9) |
| PULSE-SMARTb | 97.1 (91.4-99.1) | 93.4 (87.3-96.7) |
| Alla | 94.2 (92.2-95.7) | 95.8 (92.4-97.7) |
a
This analysis does not include the data from Krivoshei et al,27 which used an imperfect reference standard.
b
Only 1 study used this application, so the presented sensitivity and specificity were not meta-analyzed. The rest of the data are the meta-analyzed estimates.