Table 2.
E. coli disinfection by microwave irradiation in the present study in comparison to those reported in literature.
Research | Disinfection rate | Microwave application time (s) | Microwave powera (W) | Assisting approaches | E. coli surviving media |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goldblith and Wang (1967) | 6 logs | 50 | N/Ab | None | PBSc |
Fujikawa et al. (1992) | 6 logs | 90 | 300 | None | PBS |
4 logs | 150 | 200 | None | PBS | |
5 logs | 240 | 100 | None | PBS | |
Watanabe et al. (2000) | 3 logs | 50 | 500 | None | PBS |
Apostolou et al. (2005) | 6 logs | 35 | 800 | None | Small chicken portion |
Awuah et al. (2005) | 7 logs | 55 | 1200 | None | Milk |
Park et al. (2006) | 5 logs | 30 | 1000 | None | Sponge |
6 logs | 60 | 1000 | None | Scrubbing pads | |
Park et al. (2007) | 4 logs | 1 | 1000 | Argon plasma | Salined |
Takashima et al. (2007) | 8 logs | 5 | 100 | Catalytic reaction | NBe |
Present study | >4 logs | 90 | 500 | None | Nanofiber filter |
Microwave energy at the application target may not equal microwave operating power.
Not mentioned by the authors.
Phosphate buffer solution.
Normal saline, 0.9% NaCl water solution.
Nutrient broth, Eiken Chemical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.