Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 10;41(9):880–888. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.06.001

Table 2.

E. coli disinfection by microwave irradiation in the present study in comparison to those reported in literature.

Research Disinfection rate Microwave application time (s) Microwave powera (W) Assisting approaches E. coli surviving media
Goldblith and Wang (1967) 6 logs 50 N/Ab None PBSc
Fujikawa et al. (1992) 6 logs 90 300 None PBS
4 logs 150 200 None PBS
5 logs 240 100 None PBS
Watanabe et al. (2000) 3 logs 50 500 None PBS
Apostolou et al. (2005) 6 logs 35 800 None Small chicken portion
Awuah et al. (2005) 7 logs 55 1200 None Milk
Park et al. (2006) 5 logs 30 1000 None Sponge
6 logs 60 1000 None Scrubbing pads
Park et al. (2007) 4 logs 1 1000 Argon plasma Salined
Takashima et al. (2007) 8 logs 5 100 Catalytic reaction NBe
Present study >4 logs 90 500 None Nanofiber filter
a

Microwave energy at the application target may not equal microwave operating power.

b

Not mentioned by the authors.

c

Phosphate buffer solution.

d

Normal saline, 0.9% NaCl water solution.

e

Nutrient broth, Eiken Chemical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.