Skip to main content
. 2005 Aug 8;23(48):5557–5562. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.041

Table 2.

Poisson analyses, using a scan window of ≤25% of the geographic area and ≤25% of the study period, for space–time clustering of canine rabies vaccine-associated adverse events among 13 Banfield metropolitan hospital groups, January 2002 to December 2003, unadjusted and adjusted for patient covariates

Covariates adjusted for in model Most likely clustera Radius (km) Time year/month (number of month) Observed/expected ratio LLRb P-value
(None) ATL, TAM 745.61 2002/11–2003/02 (4) 53/25.4 = 2.09 11.76 0.001
Age ATL, TAM 745.61 2002/11–2003/02 (4) 53/25.9 = 2.04 11.14 0.002
Sex ATL, TAM 745.61 2002/11–2003/02 (4) 53/25.3 = 2.09 11.82 0.002
Neuter status ATL, TAM 745.61 2002/11–2003/02 (4) 53/25.3 = 2.10 11.89 0.002
Weight ATL, TAM 745.61 2002/11–2003/02 (4) 53/25.8 = 2.05 11.26 0.001
Number of vaccines ATL, TAM 745.61 2002/11–2003/02 (4) 53/26.2 = 2.02 10.84 0.007
a

ATL: Atlanta, GA; TAM: Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL.

b

LLR: log likelihood ratio statistic.