Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2007 Aug 3;40(10):1197–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2007.07.005

Bovine whey proteins – Overview on their main biological properties

Ana R Madureira 1, Cláudia I Pereira 1, Ana MP Gomes 1, Manuela E Pintado 1, F Xavier Malcata 1,
PMCID: PMC7126817

Abstract

Whey, a liquid by-product, is widely accepted to contain many valuable constituents. These include especially proteins that possess important nutritional and biological properties – particularly with regard to promotion of health, as well as prevention of diseases and health conditions. Antimicrobial and antiviral actions, immune system stimulation, anticarcinogenic activity and other metabolic features have indeed been associated with such whey proteins, as α-lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin, lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, and bovine serum albumin. The most important advances reported to date pertaining to biological properties of whey proteins are reviewed in this communication.

Keywords: Bioactive protein, Functional food, Health benefits

1. Introduction

Drinking milk is a practice that dates back to the domestication of animals in prehistoric times, and has taken advantage of the extensive nutritional value of that natural product – not only to the young born, but also to the child, the adult and the elderly. However, one major part of milk – whey, has traditionally not been paid as much attention as happened with source milk, probably because it is a by-product of cheese making, viewed for a long time as of little value (besides additive to animal feed). Interestingly, Hippocrates already applauded the health properties of whey in Ancient Greece; and during the Middle Age, whey was considered not only as a medicine, but also even as an aphrodisiac and a skin balm: it was in fact a regular component of salves and potions to soothe burns, to inspire vitality and to cure various illnesses (Kosikowski, 1982). Recent decades have witnessed an increased interest in whey protein products, owing to their nutritional role, and more and more to their active role upon human health. A multitude of bibliographic material covering that topic has accordingly been published; this review will focus on the most recent research advances pertaining to the biological properties of whey proteins.

2. Whey protein system

Milk possesses a protein system constituted by two major families of proteins: caseins (insoluble) and whey proteins (soluble). Caseins account for 80% (w/w) of the whole protein inventory, and can easily be recovered from skim milk via isoelectric precipitation (by addition of, or in situ production of acid) or rennet-driven coagulation – both of which release whey as by-product (Fig. 1 ). Whey proteins are globular molecules with a substantial content of α-helix motifs, in which the acidic/basic and hydrophobic/hydrophilic amino acids are distributed in a fairly balanced way along their polypeptide chains (Evans, 1982). The whey protein profile, including general chemical and physiochemical properties, is depicted in Table 1 . Whey proteins include β-lactoglobulin (β-LG, for short), α-lactalbumin (α-LA), immunoglobulins (IG), bovine serum albumin (BSA), bovine lactoferrin (BLF) and lactoperoxidase (LP), together with other minor components. Their main biological activities are summarized in Table 2 .

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of acid- and rennet-mediated cheese making.

Table 1.

Protein profile of whey and primary structure basic properties

Protein Concentration (g/l)a,d Molecular weight (kDa)b,c Number of amino acids residuesb
β-Lactoglobulin 1.3 18,277 162
α-Lactalbumin 1.2 14,175 123
Bovine serum albumin 0.4 66,267 582
Immunoglobulins (A, M and C) 0.7 25,000 (light chain) + 50,000–70,000 (heavy chain)
Lactoferrin 0.1 80,000 700
Lactoperoxidase 0.03 70,000 612
Glycomacropetide 1.2 6700 64

Table 2.

Biological functions of whey proteins

Protein Biological function References
Whole whey proteins Prevention of cancer
  • Breast and intestinal cancer

  • Chemically induced cancer

Gill and Cross (2000)
Badger et al., 2001, MacIntosh et al., 1995
Hakkak et al., 2000, Rowlands et al., 2001
Increment of gluthatione levels
  • Increase of tumour cell vulnerability

  • Treatment of HIV patients

Parodi (1998)
Micke et al., 2001, Micke et al., 2002
Antimicrobial activities Clare et al. (2003)
Increment of satiety response
  • Increment in plasma amino acids, cholecystokinin and glucagon-like peptide

Hall et al. (2003)



β-Lactoglobulin Transporter
  • Retinol

  • Palmitate

  • Fatty acids

  • Vitamin D and cholesterol

Puyol et al. (1991)
Wu et al. (1999)
Puyol et al. (1991)
Wang et al. (1997)
Enhancement of pregrastic esterase activity Perez et al. (1992)
Transfer of passive immunity Warme et al. (1974)
Regulation of mammary gland phosphorus metabolism Farrell et al. (1987)



α-Lactalbumin Prevention of cancer de Wit (1998)
Lactose synthesis Markus et al. (2002)
Treatment of chronic stress-induced disease Ganjam et al. (1997)



Bovine serum albumin Fatty acid binding Walzem, Dillard, and German (2002)
Anti-mutagenic function Bosselaers, Caessens, Van Boekel, and Alink (1994)
Prevention of cancer Laursen et al. (1990)



Immunomodulation
  • Disease protection through passive immunity

Ormrod and Miller (1991)
Mitra et al., 1995, Tomita et al., 1995, Loimaranta et al., 1999



Immunomodulation Antibacterial activity
  • HIV

Oona et al., 1997, Freedman et al., 1998
Antifungal activity Okhuysen et al. (1998)
Opioid activity Sharpe et al. (1994)

The actual concentrations of whey proteins depend on the type of whey (acid or sweet), the source of milk (bovine, caprine or ovine), the time of the year, the type of feed, the stage of lactation and the quality of processing. Acid whey – the pH of which is equal to or smaller than 5.1, is obtained by direct acidification of milk, as happens in cottage cheese manufacture. Sweet whey – the pH of which is equal to or higher than 5.6, is obtained after rennet-coagulation, as happens in most cheese making processes worldwide (Pintado, Macedo, & Malcata, 2001).

3. Whey protein concentrates and whey protein isolates

In the latest two decades, the evolution of separation technologies, viz. those relying on selective, porous membranes, have permitted a number of protein whey components to become widespread additives in food. Whey may indeed be subject to several treatments, thus originating whey products with specific qualitative and quantitative profiles of proteins, minerals, lipids and sugars; the afore-mentioned membrane-based separation technologies include ultrafiltration (UF) to concentrate proteins, or diafiltration (DF) to remove most lactose, minerals and low molecular weight components – and thus produce whey protein concentrates (WPC). Depending on their concentration, there are WPC containing 35%, 50%, 65% and 80% (w/w) protein. When the threshold of 90% (w/w) protein is reached, a whey protein isolate (WPI) is accordingly obtained – which is a protein concentrate bearing high-quality and purity. Both those products are used as vectors for the promotion of many biological properties upon addition to foods. If a thermal process is applied to whey then α-LA denatures easily, so it fraction can be separated via precipitation (Huffman & Harper, 1999).

3.1. Antimicrobial and antiviral properties

The biological feature of whey proteins that has been more thoroughly reviewed is their antimicrobial function (Clare, Catignani, & Swaisgood, 2003). WPC enriched with Helicobacter pylori-specific antibodies produced by lactating cows prevented infections thereby (Early, Hardy, Forde, & Kane, 2001).

On the other hand, proteins chemically modified by 3-hydroxyphthalic anhydride (3-HP), viz. BSA, α-LA and β-LG, were tested for their antiviral action against such enveloped viruses as human herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), bovine parainfluenza virus type 3 and porcine respiratory corona virus (Oevermann, Engels, Thomas, & Pellegrini, 2003). Of those three viruses, only HSV-1 was sensitive to 3-HP-proteins. All said chemically modified proteins exhibited antiviral activity against HSV-1 when assayed before, during or after infection; however, significantly higher concentrations therof were required to produce HSV-1 inhibition if present before infection, than during or afterwards.

3.2. Immune system modulation

Whey proteins suppressed in vitro lymphocyte mitogenesis and alloantigen-induced proliferation, when included in mature murine lymphocytes solutions (Barta, Barta, Crisman, & Akers, 1991). Modified WPC can also suppress the mitogen-stimulated secretion of γ-interferon, as well as the surface expression of interleukin-2 receptor, when added to T and B lymphocyte cultures (Cross & Gill, 1999). On the other hand, Mercier, Gauthier, and Fliss (2004) claimed that addition of whey proteins from microfiltered-WPI to cell culture media, at a concentration of 100 μg/ml, stimulates in vitro proliferation of murine spleen lymphocytes.

Gluthatione (GSH) is naturally found in all cells of mammals, where it provides the main intracellular defense against oxidative stresses – when illness occurs, GSH is depleted because of said stress (Fig. 2 ). The amino acids cysteine, glutamate and glycine are part of the primary structure of this peptide; cysteine incorporation is the rate-limiting step for its synthesis; and both cysteine and glutamine are major players in the coordinated T-cell response of macrophages and lymphocytes. Recall that whey proteins are rich in cysteine and glutamate residues; this suggests that their ingestion may contribute to increase the level of free cysteine, and consequent production of GSH. WPC is indeed an effective cysteine donor for GSH replenishment, during immune deficiency states; note that GSH is important in immune regulation and cancer prevention in animals, in improvement of immune and liver functions, and in helping overcome GSH-deficiency in seropositive and Alzheimer’s disease patients.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of glutathione (GHS) synthesis following whey protein intake, and most important functions associated therewith.

Cell culture studies and in vivo experiments (Gomez, Ochoa, Herrera-Insua, Carlin, & Cleary, 2002) have demonstrated that whey proteins may enhance non-specific and specific immune responses. Dietary supplementation with a whey-based product increased lymphocyte GSH levels in patients suffering from lung inflammation associated with cystic fibrosis (Grey, Mohammed, Smountas, Bahlool, & Lands, 2003).

The already mentioned high concentration of amino acid precursors in the synthesis of GSH – i.e. cysteine and glutamate in whey proteins, is believed to contribute to said immuno-enhancing effects (Wong & Watson, 1995).

Furthermore, the (long-term) Immunocal™ supplement is a WPC that has proven effective toward improvement of liver disfunctions in patients exhibiting chronic hepatitis B. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity decrease, and plasma GSH levels increased in most patients suffering from that condition, 12 weeks after provision of the aforementioned supplement started; on the other hand, serum lipid peroxide levels decreased significantly, and interleukin (IL)-2 levels and natural killer (NK) activity increased significantly (Watanabe et al., 2000). WPC has also been reported (Rosaneli, Bighetti, António, Carvalho, & Sgarbieri, 2002) to protect the gastric mucosa from ethanol damage; this protection depends on the sulfhydryl compounds present therein. In addition, WPC in moderate concentrations (10 mg/ml) can promote GSH production, which in turn enhances the antioxidant activity in a pheochromocytoma (PC12) cell line after acute ethanol exposure (Tseng et al., 2006).

The above findings have provided a basis for prevention (or treatment) of HIV-infected patients, which possess systemic GSH deficiency – that permits multiplication of that virus. Inclusion of whey protein formulae in their diet is accordingly an effective and well-tolerated route to increase their GSH levels (Micke et al., 2001, Micke et al., 2002). Moreover, whey proteins possess inhibitory activity against HIV-1 enzymes themselves – which is then crucial in attemps to constrain the life cycles of said virus (Ng, Lam, Au, Ye, & Wan, 2001).

3.3. Anticarcinogenic activity

Whey proteins have been claimed by Tsuda et al. (2000) to prevent cancer; examples include breast and intestinal cancers in female rats, when included in their diet (MacIntosh et al., 1995, Badger et al., 2001). The impact of whey proteins upon cancer prevention has been thoroughly reviewed by Gill and Cross (2000). The whole whey protein system apparently protects against colon and mammary tumours that had been chemically induced in vivo (Hakkak et al., 2000, Rowlands et al., 2001).

In vivo experiments have also unfolded the anticarcinogenic and anticancer activities ascertained to WPC, via their effect upon increase of GSH concentration in relevant tissues; stimulation of immunity via the GSH pathway actually originates anti-tumour effects in low-volume tumours (Bounous, 2000). On the other hand, published evidence (Parodi, 1998) suggests that WPC can deplete tumour cells which possess a concentration of GSH higher than normal cells, and in addition render them more vulnerable to chemotherapy; Immunocal™ actually caused depletion of GSH and inhibition of proliferation of human breast cancer cells in in vitro assays, at concentrations that induce GSH synthesis in normal human cells.

Hydrolysed WPI protected against oxidant-induced cell death in a human prostate epithelial cell line (RWPE-1), again because of the increment of GSH synthesis effected thereby (Kent, Harper, & Bomser, 2003). WPI may also protect from cancer by acting as a coadjuvant of baicalein – an anticancer drug; the cytotoxity of this molecule is enhanced by inducing more apoptosis in the human hepatoma cell line Hep G2, which is in turn associated with depletion of GSH (Tsai, Chang, Chen, & Lu, 2000).

3.4. Nutrition system effects

Whey proteins apparently facilitate attainment of favourable weight and composition. Whey proteins were found (Hall et al., 2003, Roberts et al., 2002) to be more effective in satiation than caseins, when both these proteins were studied in terms of food intake – based on ratings of hunger and fullness by selected subjects, and on postprandial metabolite and gastrointestinal hormone responses. These results imply post-absorptive increases in plasma amino acids, and suggest that both plasma cholecystokinin (CCK) and glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) are potential mediators towards increased satiety response to whey.

Furthermore, whey proteins lower plasma and liver cholesterol, as well as plasma triacylglycerol levels in model animals fed with cholesterol-containing diets (Beena and Prasad, 1997, Zhang and Beynen, 1993).

3.5. Other metabolic features

Whey proteins contribute to improve muscle strength and reduce the tendency for bone breaking; these features are directly related to their amino acid profiles. In fact, their overall amino acid composition is rather similar to that of skeletal muscle; hence, whey protein may be a good anabolic supplement. The advantages of whey proteins in terms of muscle anabolism rely on their fast absorption, coupled with the leucine abundance required to initiate synthesis – as well as on their amino acid composition, that provides substrates for protein synthesis (Ha & Zemel, 2003). In women infected with HIV, muscle strength was improved following a diet rich in whey proteins (Agin et al., 2001).

The loss of bone mass during menopause is a well documented realisation; whey proteins may provide help toward bone formation and activation of osteoblasts (bone cells) – especially in what concerns proliferation and differentiation of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells (Takada, Aoe, & Kumegawa, 1996). Bone metabolism is promoted by increments in the amount of such bone protein as collagen. Rats fed with either plain whey protein or fractioned whey protein showed a significant increase in resistance to bone breaking, and in the amounts of hydroxyproline and proline (i.e. structural amino acids of collagen) in the femur (Takada et al., 1997). Recently, acidic protein fraction prepared from mineral acid WPC reduced bone loss due to ovariectomy, maintaining bone density above ovariectomy levels at week 16 of feeding of mature female rats (Kruger et al., 2006).

4. β-Lactoglobulin

β-LG is quantitatively the dominant whey protein (58% (w/w)), and was first discovered in 1934. When in isolated form, it exhibits a low solubility (despite its globular nature) and a low ionic strength. Synthesized in the mammary gland of ruminants (and other species) and designed to be included in milk, this protein has several genetic variants – of which β-LG A is the most common. It is composed mainly of β-sheet motifs, and consists of 162 amino acid residues – which lead to a molecular weight of ca. 18,277 kDa (Eigel et al., 1984). Its quaternary structure depends on the medium pH: it occurs mainly as a stable dimmer, with a molecular weight of 36,700 kDa, at pH values between 7 and 5.2; as an octamer, with a molecular weight of ca. 140,000 kDa, at pH values between 5.2 and 3.5; and as a monomer, with two-cysteine residues per monomer, at pH 3.0 and above 8.0 (de Wit, 1989).

4.1. Immune system modulation

β-LG plays a role in transfer of passive immunity to the newborn, and in regulation of phosphorus metabolism at the mammary gland (Farrell, Bede, & Enyeart, 1987).

The amino acid content of this protein is rather important, because – besides fueling muscle growth, it is a source rich in the essential amino acid cysteine, which is important for synthesis of GSH (de Wit, 1998).

4.2. Other metabolic features

The actual biological function of β-LG is still unclear; however it often binds to small hydrophobic ligands, such as retinol, fatty acids, protoporphyrin IX, triacylglycerols, alkanes, aliphatic ketones, aromatic compounds, vitamin D, cholesterol, palmitic acid and calcium (at pH 5.0) (Brown, 1984, Cho et al., 1994, Farrell et al., 1987, Futterman and Heller, 1972, O’Neil and Kinsella, 1987, Patocka and Jelen, 1991, Puyol et al., 1991, Said et al., 1989, Smith et al., 1983, Wang et al., 1997, Wu et al., 1999). Specifically, this protein binds to free fatty acids as they are released by pregastric lipases, in order to facilitate digestion of milk fat (Perez & Calvo, 1995). Because of its high stability at low pH, β-LG protects hydrophobic molecules during passage through the stomach, in order to deliver such ligands to a specific receptor located in the intestine of the suckling neonate (Cho et al., 1994).

5. α-Lactalbumin

α-LA is quantitatively the second most important protein in whey – representing ca. 20% (w/w) of the total whey protein inventory, and is fully synthesized in the mammary gland. Here α-LA acts as coenzyme for biosynthesis of lactose – an important source of energy for the newborn (de Wit, 1998). It contains 123 amino acid residues (its sequence is quite homologous to that of lysozyme), which lead to a molecular weight of 14,175 kDa (Brew, Castellino, Vanaman, & Hill, 1970). Three genetic variants have already been identified – A, B and C (Fox, 1989). Its globular structure is stabilized by four disulphide bonds, at pH values in the range 5.4–9.0 (Evans, 1982).

5.1. Anticarcinogenic activity

α-LA contributes to reduce the risk of incidence of some cancers – as it constrains cell division, when incubated in distinct mammalian intestinal cell lines (Ganjam, Thornton, Marshall, & MacDonald, 1997). It can also be a potent Ca2+-elevating and apoptosis-inducing agent (Hakansson, Zhivotovski, Orrenius, Sabharwal, & Svanborg, 1995).

This protein also was demonstrated to possess antiproliferative effects in colon adenocarcinoma cell lines (Caco-2 or HT-29 monolayers), delaying initiation of cell aptoesis, after 4 days of growth with low concentrations (10–25 μg/ml) of such protein (Sternhagen & Allen, 2001).

5.2. Other metabolic features

This whey protein has been associated to treatment of chronic stress-induced cognitive decline. In fact, an imbalance in brain serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) function was claimed to be a factor mediating the negative effect of chronic stress on cognitive performance; serotonin release decreases under exposure to chronic stress, thus decreasing the available concentrations of brain serotonin and tryptophan (a precursor of serotonin) both of which cause serotonin activity to fall below functional needs. Due to its high tryptophan content (ca. 6% (w/w)), a diet based on α-LA increases the plasma tryptophan-large neutral amino acids (Trp-LNAA) ratio (Markus, Olivier, & de Haan, 2002).

6. Bovine serum albumin

BSA is not synthesized in the mammary gland, but appears instead in milk following passive leakage from the blood stream. It contains 582 amino acid residues, which lead to a molecular weight of 66,267 kDa; it also possesses 17 intermolecular disulphide bridges and one thiol group at residue 34 (Fox, 1989). Because of its size and higher levels of structure, BSA can bind to free fatty acids and other lipids, as well as flavour compounds (Kinsella, Whitehead, Brady, & Bringe, 1989) – a feature that is severely hampered upon denaturation. Its heat-induced gelation at pH 6.5 is initiated by an intermolecular thiol–disulphide interchange, similar to what happens with β-LG (de Wit, 1989).

6.1. Anticarcinogenic activity

One important property that has been associated to BSA is the ability to inhibit tumour growth; in vitro incubation with human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 has provided adequate evidence thereof, which lies on modulation of activities of the autocrine growth regulatory factors (Laursen, Briand, & Lykkesfeldt, 1990).

6.2. Other metabolic features

The aforementioned binding properties of BSA depend on the fatty acid (or other small molecules) in stake (Brown & Shockley, 1982). Binding to fatty acids, that are stored in the human body as fat, allow it to participate in synthesis of lipids – which are a part of all outer and inner cell membranes, and which provide energy; this issue has been reviewed at some length by Choi et al. (2002).

The antioxidant activities of this protein have been tackled by Tong, Sasaki, McClements, and Decker (2000). BSA has been shown to in vitro protect lipids against phenolic-induced oxidation (Smith, Halliwell, & Aruoma, 1992).

7. Immunoglobulins

IG constitute a complex group, the elements of which are produced by B-lymphocytes; they make a significant contribution to the whey protein content – besides exerting an important immunological function (especially in colostrums). These proteins are present in the serum and physiological fluids of all mammals; some of them attach to surfaces, where they behave as receptors, whereas others function as antibodies, which are released in the blood and lymph. IG are subject to postnatal transfer via colostrum – as the placenta does not permit passage of macromolecules (Butler, 1994). The structure and general function of bovine IG have been reviewed by Korhonen, Marnila, and Gill (2000).

In terms of quaternary structure, IG are either monomers or polymers of a four-chain molecule, consisting of two light polypeptide chains (with a molecular weight in the range 25,000 kDa) and two heavy chains (with molecular weight of 50,000–70,000 kDa) (Mulvihill & Donovan, 1987). The nomenclature of the elements of this family is based on their immunological cross-reaction with reference proteins, preferably of human origin, as proposed by WHO (Butler, 1971). There are, however, three basic classes of IG: IGG, IGA and IGM, although IGG is often sub-divided into two subclasses – IGG1 and IGG2. Up to 80% (w/w) of all IG in milk or whey is accounted for by IGG (de Wit, 1989) but qualitatively, the family of IG found in bovine whey and colostrum include IGA and secretory IGA, IGG1, IGG2 and IGG fragments, IGM, IGE, J-chain or component, and free secretor component.

7.1. Antimicrobial and antiviral properties

Antibody concentrates derived from immune colostrum and milk collected from cows immunised with inactivated human rotavirus (HRV) serotypes 1 (Wa) and 2 (S2), as well as simian rotavirus serotype 3 (SA11) were shown to possess preventive (or treatment) features in enteric disease caused by said viruses in piglets (Schaller et al., 1992), and in therapeutics of child infections caused thereby (Sarker et al., 1998). Infant gastritis originated by H. pylori is well fought via a diet including immune milk containing specific anti-H. pylori antibodies (Oona et al., 1997). Other studies were performed against infections in calves caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (Moon & Bunn, 1993), and even infections in humans caused by enteropathogenic (Freedman, Tacket, & Delehanty, 1998).

Okhuysen et al. (1998) tackled the use of immune bovine colostrum on treatment of HIV-patients bearing infections caused by Cryptosporidium parvum. There is also evidence of protection via bovine antibodies against dental caries caused by cariogenic streptococci (Loimaranta et al., 1999). In a study involving two groups of mice – one fed with immune milk obtained from cows immunised with a mixed bacterial flora, and a control group fed regularly, they were exposed to lethal doses of irradiation, and their survival rate was compared; the survival rate of the test group was higher than that of the control group, and the concentration of IGA in cell culture derived from Peyer’s patches, mesenteric lymph node and spleen of the former group was also higher (Kobayashi et al., 1991).

7.2. Immune system modulation

IG are recognised to provide protection against diseases in the newborn through passive immunity. Most studies have focussed on newborn ruminants, but more recent research has started exploring the effects on non-ruminants and adults.

Feeding of pregnant cows with immune milk, or systemic immunisation thereof has been a common technique applied in several research efforts; the latter procedure increases the levels of antibodies against immunising bacteria, and also reduces susceptibility to disease (Ormrod & Miller, 1991). Vaccination of pregnant cows originates colostrum characterized by high concentrations of specific antibodies against the antigens of the vaccine used (Korhonen et al., 1995). Tomita, Todhunter, Hogan, and Smith (1995) studied the effect on cows of a vaccine containing a lipopolysaccharide–protein conjugate derived from E. coli J5; immunisation enhanced the serum antibody titer to J5, but not the whey titer to IGG.

7.3. Other metabolic features

Immune milk was also suggested to lower blood pressure (Sharpe, Gamble, & Sharpe, 1994). In a double-blind, clinical-trial study, the effects on reduction of plasma cholesterol and blood pressure of immune milk produced by dairy cows previously hyper-immunised with a multivalent bacterial vaccine were assessed, involving human hypercholesterolemic subjects – who consumed 90 g of immune milk daily, versus regular milk; the former was a useful adjunct in the dietary management of hypercholesterolemia (Sharpe et al., 1994).

8. Lactoferrin

BLF is an iron-chelating, monomeric glycoprotein, characterized by a molecular weight of 80,000 kDa, to which two carbohydrate groups are attached (de Wit, 1989, Lonnerdal and Iyer, 1995). It is present in the human body as a secretor protein – synthesized by glandular epithelial cells and mature neutrophils, and can be found in milk, saliva, tears, nasal and intestinal secretions, pancreatic juice and seminal fluid, as well as in secondary granules of neutrophils (Lonnerdal & Iyer, 1995). Bovine milk contains between 0.02 and 0.35 mg/ml of BLF, depending on the period of lactation – whereas human milk contains ca. 4.00 mg/ml. Two other proteins with iron-chelating properties are transferrin and ovotransferrin; these proteins – as happens with BLF, possess two metal-binding sites, designed to attach to ferric ion (Fe3+) and bicarbonate ion (HCO3-), respectively. The iron-free protein is usually termed apo-BLF.

8.1. Antimicrobial and antiviral properties

A review on the antimicrobial properties of lactoferrin is available elsewhere (Fernaud & Evans, 2003). Its antibacterial activity has been attributed to the aforementioned iron-binding property – which makes it unavailable the (otherwise active) microorganisms, or by direct binding to their microbial membrane. Nevertheless, the action of this protein is not restricted to bacteria with iron requirements (e.g. coliforms), because apo-BLF was also shown to possess bactericidal power against a wide range of microorganisms (Dionysius, Grieve, & Milne, 1993). BLF can damage the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria via binding to Lipid A lipopolysaccharides (LPS) – which compose their asymmetric lipid bilayer membrane (Appelmelk et al., 1994); release thereof causes structural changes, which include loss of membrane potential and integrity. The antibacterial activity of LF also depends on its concentration or the degree of iron saturation of the molecule, and on its interaction with mineral medium constituents (Payne, Davidson, Oliver, & Christen, 1990).

The antimicrobial effect of BLF can be taken advantage of in treatment of enteric infections (as depicted in Table 3 ). In vivo studies, encompassing animal models, have proven that BLF helps eliminate E. coli endotoxins, when bovine colostrum is administered into the gut under conditions of septic shock (Dohler & Nebermann, 2002). BLF may act synergistically with lysozyme or antibodies (Ellison & Giehl, 1991), immunoglobulins and LP, and can potentiate the activity of such antibiotics as novobiocin against Gram-negative bacteria (Sanchez & Watts, 1999). Alone or in combination with penicillin G, BLF enhances Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to immune-defense mechanisms; this can be a beneficial trait in the treatment of infections caused thereby (Diarra et al., 2003). Another bacterium inhibited by that protein is Streptococcus mutans – the prime cause of dental caries; BLF inhibits aggregation of those saliva induced-bacteria to salivary components, or to salivary films (Mitoma et al., 2001, Oho et al., 2002). In addition, BLF has been demonstrated (Hoerr & Bostwick, 2000) to protect against such pathogens as Haemophilus influenzae, which causes otitis media (ear infections) in children. In vivo and in vitro tests carried out by Dial et al. (1998) confirmed that BLF possesses antimicrobial activity against H. pylori infections at pH 6, at concentrations above 0.5 mg/ml, and is able to clear H. felis infection in mouse; and that a non-iron-dependent component of such a protein displays antimicrobial activity. Thereof, use of bovine BLF as therapeutic agent to assist antimicrobial agents towards erradication of such harmful bacterium was suggested (Di Mário et al., 2003). Recently, BLF was found to exibit antibacterial activity against Carnobacterium viridans, at neutral pH and refrigeration temperatures (al-Nabulsi & Holley, 2005).

Table 3.

Antiviral and antimicrobial properties of whey proteins, and mechanisms of action thereof

Protein Protection against Protection mechanisms References
Immunoglobulin (antibodies) Helicobacter pylori Agglutination Oona et al. (1997)
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Bacteriolysis Freedman et al. (1998)
Cariogenic streptococci Bacteriostasis Loimaranta et al. (1999)
E. coli J5 Opsonization Tomita et al. (1995)
Cryptosporidium parvum Okhuysen et al. (1998)
Human and simian rotavirus Neutralization of virus and toxins Schaller et al. (1992)



Lactoferrin Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) Binding of iron Yamaguchi et al. (1993)
Enterohemorragic E. coli (EHEC) Destabilization of outer membranes Shin et al. (2000)
Shigella flexneri-induced inflamatory enteritis Synergetic action with antibiotics, lysozyme or antibodies Gomez et al. (2002)
Haemophilus influenzae Modulation of mononuclear cell functions or peripheral Hoerr and Bostwick (2000)
Vibrio cholerae Blood neutrophil polymorphonuclear leucocytes Mitoma et al., 2001, Oho et al., 2002
Streptococcus mutans
Trichophyton mentagrophytes, T. rubrum Wakabayashi et al. (2000)
Carnobacterium viridans al-Nabulsi and Holley (2005)
HIV-1 Prevention of virus binding Berkhout et al. (2002), Ng et al. (2001), Wang et al. (2000)
Inhibition of HIV-1 enzyme (reverse transcriptase) Lubashevsky et al. (2004)
Seoul type hantavirus Inhibition of viral entrance
Cytomegalovirus
Poliovirus-1
Simian rotavirus SA11 Superti and Donelli (1995)
Enterovirus 71 Binding to VP-1 protein and host cells Lin et al., 2005, Weng et al., 2005
Human papillomavirus Inhibition of viral entrance Drobni et al. (2004)
Hepatitis C, G and B Interaction with E1 and E2 envelope proteins Ikeda et al., 1998, Isawa et al., 2002, Ishii et al., 2003, Yi et al., 1997
Inhibition of viral entrance by neutralisation of virion
Increase of Th-1-cytokine in peripheral blood
Interaction with host cell surface proteins
Herpes simplex virus (HSV-1, HSV-2) Binding to host cells and to receptor co-receptor of virus (HSPG) Laquerre et al., 1998, Marchetti et al., 2004
Lactoperoxidase Gram-positive bacteria Oxidation of SH-groups of cell membranes Bacteriostasis Santos et al., 1994, Zapico et al., 1995
Gram-negative bacteria Bacteriolysis



Glycomacropeptide
Dental plaque Inhibition of adhesion of bacteria and viruses to epithelial cells/dental plaque Isoda, Kawasaki, Tanimoto, Dosako, and Idota (1999), Kawasaki et al. (1992), Schupbach, Neeser, Golliard, Rouvet, and Guggenheim (1996)
Dental caries Inhibition of binding of cholera toxin to its receptor and heat-labile enterotoxins LT-I and LT-II
Enterotoxigenic E. coli
Influenza virus haemaglutonin Kawasaki et al. (1993)

Recent studies encompassing guinea pigs have demonstrated that iron-unsaturated BLF is active against the fungi Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton rubrum – which are responsible for dermatophytosis (Wakabayashi et al., 2000, Wakabayashi et al., 2002). Diets containing BLF fed to guinea-pigs previously infected (or immunised) with T. mentagrophytes potentiated the host antifungal defense systems, by modulating the mononuclear cell functions encompassing antifungal activity, or the release of peripheral blood neutrophil polymorphonuclear leucocytes in plasma.

Incidentally, BLF was the first whey protein which was ascribed an anti-viral activity; this subject was comprehensively reviewed by van der Strate, Beljaars, Molema, Harmsen, and Meijer (2001). Said activity was suggested against several species of virus, as depicted in Table 3. BLF also plays a preventive role of AIDS-like disease (ALD) in mice, at least for a restricted period of time – when administrated 20 days prior to viral infection (Lubashevsky et al., 2004).

The major mechanisms by which BLF is believed to exert its antiviral activity are summarized in Table 3. BLF interacts with viruses, but not with cells infected thereby; however, it can interact with the host cells before they are infected – like happens with hepatitis B virus (HBV) for which interaction with the cell surface proteins blocks viral adhesion to the cells themselves (Hara et al., 2002). This issue was confirmed with regard to E1 and E2 HVC envelope proteins in vitro (Yi, Kaneko, Yu, & Murakumi, 1997), and in the case of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (Ng et al., 2001). In what concerns hepatitis C and G viruses (HVC and HGV, respectively), BLF inhibits the viral entry into hepatocyte and lymphocyte cells – via neutralising the virion, and blocking the invasion of the cell thereby (Ikeda et al., 1998). In the case of HIV-1, succinylation of that protein slightly increases the extent of inhibition of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (Wang, Ye, & Ng, 2000). In vivo experiments involving HIV-infected individuals have indicated that BLF inhibits strongly that enzyme, but only slightly protease and integrase (Ng et al., 2001). Recently, LF was found to inhibit in vitro enterovirus 71 (EV 71), via binding to one of their four capsid proteins, VP1; furthermore, BLF can induce IFN-α expression of neuronal (SK-N-SH) cells and inhibit EV 7-induced IL-6 production (Weng et al., 2005).

Except in the case of simian rotavirus (Superti & Donelli, 1995), another mechanism hypothesized for binding of BLF to host cells is via a receptor (or co-receptor) – such as heparin sulphate proteoglycans (HSPG), which prevent binding of the virus thereto, and subsequent infection of the host cell (Laquerre et al., 1998). Recently, Marchetti, Trybala, Superti, Johansson, and Bergström (2004) elucidated the mechanism of BLF antiviral activity against HSV-1 infection initiates infection of cells via binding to it glycosaminoglycans (GAG) (WuDunn & Spear, 1989), which are composed of repeating (specifically sulphated) disaccharide units. BLF binds specifically to the two common classes, heparan sulfate (HS) and/or chondroitin sulfate (CS), on cell surfaces – hence occupying moieties that would function as initial receptors for said virus. This mechanism was promote (Drobni, Näslund, & Evander, 2004) to be similar to human papillomavirus inhibition. Bovine BLF was also shown (Ishii et al., 2003) to reduce serum HVC-RNA levels in patients suffering from chronic hepatitis C; a dominant environment of Th1-cytokine is produced in the peripheral blood that favours eradication of HVC via interferon (IFN) therapy.

8.2. Immune system modulation

BLF plays an important role upon stimulation of the immune system, probably owing to increase of macrophage activity, as well as induction of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-8, TNF-α and nitric oxide (McCormick et al., 1991, Sorimachi et al., 1997), stimulation of proliferation of lymphocytes (Potjewijd, 1999), and activation of monocytes, natural killer (NK) cells (Ambruso and Johnson, 1981, Nishiya and Horwitz, 1982) and neutrophils (Gahr, Speer, Damerau, & Sawatzki, 1991). Kuhara et al. (2000) administrated LF orally, and reported that the induction of IL-8 secretion by epithelial cells acts so as to enhance Th1 cell functions, and augment NK cells and cytotoxic lymphocyte activities.

BLF has also been reported to stimulate humoral immune response to sheep red blood cells, to promote appropriate intestinal and peripheral specific antibody response, and to modulate production of lymphokines (German, Dillard, & Walzem, 2000). When of bovine origin, both BLF and hydrolysed forms thereof enhance mucosal immunity – which is dependent on the ability of BLF to bind to the intestinal mucosa (Debbabi, Dubarry, Rautureau, & Tome, 1998).

The aforementioned activities depend on the target cells, and arise from the ability of BLF to bind to specific molecules. As suggested before, BLF possesses an LPS-binding property, and this property is a part of the immunomodulatory function of BLF. LPS, as a highly cationic glycoprotein, binds to lipid A portion of LPS via charge–charge interaction. Recently, Na et al. (2004) claimed that, upon mixing LPS and purified LF, they subsequently formed a complex LPS-LF, which induced inflammatory mediators in macrophages rather than LPS activity. The latter work proposed that lipid A – a toxic portion of LPS, can be recognized even after LF-LPS has been formed, and that this complex induces tolerance to LPS-stimulation.

8.3. Anticarcinogenic activity

Several studies, based on data from such animals as mice and rats, have provided stronger and stronger evidence for the therapeutic value of BLF in treating distinct types of cancer (Gill & Cross, 2000), viz. colon cancer (Masuda et al., 2000). The iron-binding capacity of BLF has been put forward as the molecular rationale behind such a biological activity; free iron may act as a mutagenic promoter, by inducing oxidative damage to the nucleic acid structure; hence, when BLF binds iron in tissues, it reduces the risk of oxidant-induced carcinomas (Weinberg, 1996) and colon adenocarcinomas (Tsuda et al., 1998). Studies are available (Masuda et al., 2000; Tanaka et al., 2000) that pertain to such other cancers as lung, bladder, tongue and oesophagus, and which convey similar results.

8.4. Other metabolic features

Supplementing the diet of dairy calves with BLF has been tried, along with monitoring its effect on their performance (Joslin et al., 2002); BLF was able to improve the average daily gain, and decrease weaning in dairy calves.

An in vivo research effort conducted by Kajikawa et al. (1994) led them to hypothetize that BLF may act as an antiatherogenic agent, by inhibiting accumulation of cholesterol esters in macrophages – which are ‘precursors of the foam cells found in early atherosclerotic lesions. This protein can furthermore survive gastric digestion in adults (Troost, Steijns, Saris, & Brummer, 2001), and bears no toxicity when orally administered to rats (Yamauchi et al., 2000); these two reasons account for its regular use as bioactive ingredient for therapeutic administration.

9. Lactoperoxidase

Lactoperoxidase (LP) is present in a variety of animal secretions, viz. tears, saliva and milk. A member of the family of mammalian peroxidases, it is one of the most abundant enzymes in plain milk – it represents ca. 1% (w/w) of the total protein pool in whey (Reiter & Perraudin, 1991). The complete LP system (i.e. enzyme plus substrate) was originally characterized in milk by Reiter, Pickering, Oram, and Pope (1963); its activity depends on many factors, e.g. animal species (Pruitt & Reiter, 1985), breed and lactation cycle (Zapico, Gaya, de Paz, Nunez, & Medina, 1991).

Other members of that group of oxidoreductases include myeloperoxidase (present in neutrophils and monocytes), eosinophil peroxidase and thyroid peroxidase. Chemical sequencing unfolded a great degree of homology between them, which suggests a close evolutionary relationship among those enzymes (Petrides, 1998). Peroxidases utilise hydrogen peroxide to oxidise thiocyanate to hypothiocyanate, and are active in a variety of anatomic locations (Thomas, Bozeman, & Learn, 1991).

9.1. Antimicrobial and antiviral properties

LP is an important part of the natural host defense system in mammals, which provides protection against invading microorganisms (de Wit & van Hooydonk, 1996). The antibacterial ability of peroxidases was first described (Agner, 1941) in verdoperoxidase (later renamed myeloperoxidase) from leukocytes – which is able to inactivate diphtheria toxin; such an antimicrobial activity has been proven against Gram-positive (Zapico, Gaya, Nunez, & Medina, 1995) and negative (Zapico et al., 1995) microorganisms.

The mechanism of action of LP has been explained in detail elsewhere (de Wit & van Hooydonk, 1996); such an enzyme is more active at acidic pH (Wever, Kast, Kasinoedin, & Boelend, 1982). The antimicrobial activity of peroxidases depends on the ion acting as electron donor. The LP system is completed when LP, thiocyanate ion (SCN) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are present together (Reiter & Harnulv, 1984). The thiocyanate anion – which is necessary for the antibacterial activity of LP be expressed, appears to significant extents in saliva, milk and airway secretions (Reiter & Perraudin, 1991), and originates from glucosinolates via detoxification of the cyanogenic glucosides present in the feed. The amount of SCN in cow’s milk ranges from 0.1 to 15 mg/kg (Perraudin, 1991); its concentration varies according to animal species (de Wit & van Hooydonk, 1996), breed, lactation cycle (Zapico et al., 1991), season (Dabur, Srivastava, & Kapoor, 1996) and composition of feed (Thomas, 1981).

LP-catalysed reactions yield short-life, intermediary oxidation products of SCN, which are responsible for its antibacterial activity. The major intermediary oxidation product, at physiological pH, is hypothiocyanate (OSCN), which is produced at the stoichiometric ratio of 1 mol/mol of hydrogen peroxide (Pruitt & Tenovuo, 1982). Other products possessing antimicrobial activity are also formed in this reaction, viz. cyanosulphurous acid (HO2SCN) and cyanosulphuric acid (HO3SCN) (Bjorck, 1979); these compounds are able to oxidise sulphidrile groups of bacterial proteins (Reiter & Harnulv, 1984). The anion OSCN is thought to mediate bacterial killing, as it is cell-permeable and can inhibit glycolysis, as well as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)/nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-dependent reactions in bacteria (Reiter & Perraudin, 1991).

Hydrogen peroxide is produced in endogenous form by polymorphonuclear leukocytes (de Wit & van Hooydonk, 1996), and by numerous other microorganisms (Pruitt, Kamau, Miller, Mansson-Rahemtulla, & Rahemtulla, 1990), viz. resident bacteria in such sites as the oral cavity, or generated in situ by cells the respiratory tract (Reiter & Perraudin, 1991). It can also be produced by specific generator systems, such as via oxidation of ascorbic acid, oxidation of glucose-oxidase, oxidation of hypoxanthine by xanthine oxidase, and manganese-dependent aerobic oxidation of reduced pyridine nucleotides by peroxidase (Wolason & Sumner, 1993). The H2O2 content is rapidly reduced by catalases and peroxidases that are adventitious in milk; hence, it is normally present to very small levels (Bjorck, Rosen, Marshall, & Reiter, 1975). While H2O2 can behave as bactericidal or bacteriostatic, experimental evidence indicates that inhibition of bacterial growth is far more efficient in the presence of the complete LP system (Reiter & Perraudin, 1991).

Studies pertaining to the antimicrobial effects of LP have focused on its role upon thermal resistance of Salmonella spp. (Doyle & Mazzotta, 2000), in both raw (Heuvelink et al., 1998) and mature milk (Shin, Tomita, & Lonnerdal, 2000). Peroxidases are important in inhibiting dental caries, in controlling microorganism growth in milk from lactating animals, and in cell-mediated pathogen killing (Reiter & Perraudin, 1991). Poulsson, Hegg, and Castberg (1986) patented a process that uses an LP system for dental (and other wound) treatment.

Bacterial resistance to LP-mediated killing may occur via enzymes which act in a reverse way – and which inactivate OSCN, prevent pigment generation and constrain anaerobic metabolism (Reiter & Perraudin, 1991).

Acknowledgements

Partial funding for this research work was provided via project PROBIOSORO, administrated by Agência de Inovação – POCTI: Programa Operacional de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Funding for authors A.R. Madureira and C.I. Pereira was via Ph.D. fellowships, administered by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/18500/2004 and SFRH/BD/18000/2004, respectively).

References

  1. Agin D., Gallagher D., Wang J., Heymsfield S.B., Pierson R.N., Kottler D.P. Effect of whey protein and resistant exercise of body cell mass, muscle strength and quality of life in women with HIV. AIDS. 2001;15:2431–2440. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200112070-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agner K. Verdoperoxidase, a ferment isolated from leucocytes. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1941;2:5–62. [Google Scholar]
  3. al-Nabulsi A.A., Holley R.A. Effect of bovine lactoferrin against Carnobacterium viridans. Food Microbiology. 2005;22:179–187. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ambruso D.R., Johnson R.B. Lactoferrin enhances hydroxyl radical production by human neutrophils, neutrophil particulate fractions, and an enzymatic generating system. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1981;67:352–360. doi: 10.1172/JCI110042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Appelmelk B.J., An Y.-Q., Geerst M., Thijs B.G., de Boer H.A., McClaren D.M., et al. Lactoferrin is a lipid A-binding protein. Infection and Immunity. 1994;62:2628–2632. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.6.2628-2632.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Badger T.M., Ronis M.J.J., Hakkak R. Developmental effects and health aspects of soy protein isolate, casein and whey in male and female rats. International Journal of Toxicology. 2001;20:165–174. doi: 10.1080/109158101317097755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barta O., Barta V.D., Crisman M.V., Akers R.M. Inhibition of lymphocyte blastogenesis by whey. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 1991;52:247–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beena A., Prasad V. Effect of yoghurt and bifidus yoghurt fortified with skim milk powder, condensed whey and lactose-hydrolysed condensed whey on serum cholesterol and triacylglycerol levels in rats. Journal of Dairy Research. 1997;64:453–457. doi: 10.1017/s0022029997002252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berkhout B., van Wamel J.L., Belijaars L., Meijer D.K., Visser S., Floris R. Characterization of the anti-HIV effects of native lactoferrin and other milk proteins and protein-derived peptides. Antiviral Research. 2002;55:341–355. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(02)00069-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bjorck L. Antibacterial effect of the lactoperoxidase system on psychotrophic bacteria in milk. Journal of Dairy Research. 1979;45:109–118. doi: 10.1017/s0022029900016253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bjorck L., Rosen C.G., Marshall V., Reiter B. Antibacterial activity of the lactoperoxidase system in milk against pseudomonads and other gram-negative bacteria. Applied Microbiology. 1975;30:199–204. doi: 10.1128/am.30.2.199-204.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bosselaers I.M., Caessens P.R., Van Boekel M.S., Alink G.M. Differential effects of milk proteins, BSA and soy protein on 4NQO- or MNNG-induced SCEs in V79 cells. Food Chemistry and Toxicology. 1994;32:905–911. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(94)90088-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bounous G. Whey protein concentrate (WPC) and glutathione modulation in cancer treatment. Anticancer Research. 2000;20:4785–4792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brew K., Castellino F.J., Vanaman T.C., Hill R.L. The complete amino acid sequence of bovine α-lactalbumin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1970;10:4570–4582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown E.M. Interaction of β-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin with lipids: A review. Journal of Dairy Science. 1984;67:713–722. [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown J.R., Shockley P. In: Lipid protein interactions. Jost P., Griffith O.H., editors. Wiley; New York: 1982. Serum albumin: Structure and characterization of its ligand binding sites. [Google Scholar]
  17. Butler J.E. Physicochemical and immunochemical studies on bovine IgA and glycoprotein-α. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1971;251:435–449. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(71)90133-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Butler, J. E. (1994). Passive immunity and immunoglobulin diversity. In Indigenous Antimicrobial Agents of Milk – Recent Developments. IDF Special Issue, 94044, 14–50.
  19. Cho Y., Batt C.A., Sawyer L. Probing the retinol-binding site of bovine β-lactoglobulin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1994;269:11102–11107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Choi J.K., Ho J., Curry S., Qin D., Bittman R., Hamilton J.A. Interactions of very long-chain saturated fatty acids with serum albumin. Journal of Lipid Research. 2002;43:1000–1010. doi: 10.1194/jlr.m200041-jlr200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Clare D.A., Catignani G.L., Swaisgood H.E. Biodefense properties of milk, the role of antimicrobial proteins and peptides. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2003;9:1239–1255. doi: 10.2174/1381612033454874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cross M.L., Gill H.S. Modulation of immune function by a modified bovine whey protein concentrate. Immunology and Cell Biology. 1999;77:345–350. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.1999.00834.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dabur R.S., Srivastava D.N., Kapoor C.M. Effect of season, separation and heating temperatures on the residual thiocyanate levels in lactoperoxidase-preserved buffalo milk. Journal of Dairy Food Home Science. 1996;15:30–34. [Google Scholar]
  24. Debbabi H., Dubarry M., Rautureau M., Tome A.D. Bovine lactoferrin induces both mucosal and systemic immune response in mice. Journal of Dairy Research. 1998;65:283–293. doi: 10.1017/s0022029997002732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. de Wit J.N. In: Developments of dairy chemistry. Fox P.F., editor. Vol. 4. Applied Science; London: 1989. Functional properties of whey proteins. (Functional milk proteins). [Google Scholar]
  26. de Wit J.N. Nutritional and functional characteristics of whey proteins in food products. Journal of Dairy Science. 1998;81:597–602. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75613-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. de Wit J.N., van Hooydonk A.C.M. Structure, functions and applications of lactoperoxidase in natural antimicrobial systems. Netherlands Milk Dairy Journal. 1996;50:227–244. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dial E.J., Hall L.R., Serna H., Romero J.J., Fox J.G., Lichtenberg L.M. Antibiotic properties of bovine lactoferrin in the host infected with Helycobacter pylori. Digestive Diseases Science. 1998;43:2750–2756. doi: 10.1023/a:1026675916421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Diarra M.S., Petitclerc D., Deschênes É., Lessard N., Grondin G., Talbot B.G., et al. Lactoferrin against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Lactoferrin alone or in combination with penicillin G on bovine polymorphonuclear function and mammary cells colonisation by Staphylococcus aureus. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2003;95:33–42. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(03)00098-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dionysius D.A., Grieve P.A., Milne J.M. Forms of lactoferrin. Their effect on enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Journal of Dairy Science. 1993;76:2597–2606. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77594-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Di Mário F., Aragona G., Dal Bo N., Cavestro G.M., Cavallaro L., Iori V., et al. Use of bovine lactoferrin for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2003;35:706–710. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dohler J.R., Nebermann L. Bovine colostrum in oral treatment of enterogenic endotoxaemia in rats. Critical Care. 2002;6:536–539. doi: 10.1186/cc1819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Doyle M.E., Mazzotta A.S. Review of studies on the thermal resistance of salmonellae. Journal of Food Protection. 2000;63:779–795. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.6.779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Drobni P., Näslund J., Evander M. Lactoferrin inhibits human papillomavirus binding and uptake in vitro. Antiviral Research. 2004;64:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2004.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Early E.M., Hardy H., Forde T., Kane M. Bactericidal effects of a whey protein concentrate with anti-Helyobacter activity. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2001;90:741–748. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Eigel W.N., Butler J.E., Ernstrom C.A., Farrell H.M., Harwalkar V.R., Jenness R., et al. Nomenclature of proteins of cow’s milk: Fifth revision. Journal of Dairy Science. 1984;67:1599–1631. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ellison R.T., Giehl T.J. Killing of Gram-negative bacteria by lactoferrin and lysozyme. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1991;88:1080–1091. doi: 10.1172/JCI115407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Evans E.W. In: Developments in Food Proteins. Hudson B.J.F., editor. Applied Science; London: 1982. Uses of milk proteins in formulated foods. [Google Scholar]
  39. Farrell H.M., Bede M.J., Enyeart J.A. Binding of p-nitrophenyl phosphate and other aromatic compounds by β-LG. Journal of Dairy Science. 1987;70:252–258. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fernaud S., Evans R.W. Lactoferrin – a multifunctional protein with antimicrobial properties. Molecular Immunology. 2003;40:395–405. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(03)00152-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fox P.F. In: Developments in Dairy Chemistry. Fox P.F., editor. Vol. 4. Applied Science; London: 1989. The milk protein system. (Functional Milk Proteins). [Google Scholar]
  42. Freedman D.J., Tacket C.O., Delehanty A. Milk immunoglobulins with specific activity against purified colonisation factor antigens can protect against oral challenge with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1998;177:662–667. doi: 10.1086/514227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Futterman S., Heller J. The enhancement of fluorescence and the decreased susceptibility to enzymatic oxidation of retinol complexed with bovine serum albumin, β-lactoglobulin and the retinol-binding protein of human plasma. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1972;247:5168–5172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gahr M., Speer C.P., Damerau B., Sawatzki G. Influence of lactoferrin on the function of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes. Journal of Leucocyte Biology,49. 1991:427–433. doi: 10.1002/jlb.49.5.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ganjam L.S., Thornton W.H., Marshall R.T., MacDonald R.S. Antiproliferative effects of yoghurt fractions obtained by membrane dialysis on cultured mammalian intestinal cells. Journal of Dairy Science. 1997;80:2325–2339. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76183-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. German, J. B., Dillard, C. J., & Walzem, R. L. (2000). US Whey products and dairy ingredients for health, a review. In Applications Monograph. Chicago, The American Dairy Products Institute Monograph, US Dairy Export Council.
  47. Gill H.S., Cross M.L. Anticancer properties of bovine milk. British Journal of Bovine Milk. 2000;84:161–165. doi: 10.1017/s0007114500002397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gomez H.F., Ochoa T.J., Herrera-Insua I., Carlin L.G., Cleary T.G. Lactoferrin protects rabbits from Shigella flexneri-induced inflammatory enteritis. Infection and Immunity. 2002;70:7050–7053. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.7050-7053.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Grey V., Mohammed S.R., Smountas A.A., Bahlool R., Lands L.C. Improved glutathione status in young adult patients with cystic fibrosis supplemented with whey protein. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2003;2:195–198. doi: 10.1016/S1569-1993(03)00097-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hakansson A., Zhivotovski B., Orrenius S., Sabharwal H., Svanborg C. Apoptosis induced by a human milk protein. Proceedings of the US National Academy of Sciences. 1995;92:8064–8068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.17.8064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hakkak R., Korourian S., Shelnutt S.R., Lensing S., Ronis M.J.J., Badger T.M. Diets containing whey proteins or soy protein isolate protect against 2,12-dimethylben(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumours in female rats. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2000;9:113–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hall W.L., Millward D.J., Long S.J., Morgan L.M. Casein and whey exert different effects on plasma amino acid profiles, gastrointestinal hormone secretion and appetite. British Journal of Nutrition. 2003;89:339–348. doi: 10.1079/BJN2002760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hara K., Ikeda M., Saito S., Matsumoto S., Numata K., Kato N., et al. Lactoferrin inhibits hepatitis B virus infection in cultured human hepatocytes. Hepatology Research. 2002;24:228–235. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6346(02)00088-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ha E., Zemel M.B. Functional properties of whey, whey components, and essential amino acids: Mechanisms underlying health benefits for active people (review) Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2003;14:251–258. doi: 10.1016/s0955-2863(03)00030-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Heuvelink A.E., Bleumink B., van den Biggelaar F.L.A.M., Te-Giffel M.C., Beumer R.R., de Boer E. Occurrence and survival of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 in raw cow’s milk in The Netherlands. Journal of Food Protection,61. 1998:1597–1601. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.12.1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hoerr R.A., Bostwick E.F. Bioactive proteins and probiotic bacteria: Modulators of nutritional health. Nutrition. 2000;16:711–713. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(00)00348-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Huffman L.M., Harper W.J. Maximizing the value of milk through separation technologies. Journal of Dairy Science. 1999;82:2238–2244. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75471-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ikeda M., Nozaki A., Sugiyama K., Tanaka T., Naganuma A., Tanaka K., et al. Lactoferrin markedly inhibits hepatitis C virus infection in cultured human hepatocytes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1998;245:549–553. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Isawa M., Kaito M., Ikoma J. Lactoferrin inhibits heptatitis C virus in chronic hepatitis C patients with high viral loads and HVC genotype 1b. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2002;97:766–767. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ishii K., Takamura N., Shinohara M., Wakui N., Shin H., Sumino Y., et al. Long-term follow up of chronic hepatitis C patients treated with oral lactoferrin for 12 months. Hepatology Research. 2003;25:226–233. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6346(02)00279-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Isoda H., Kawasaki Y., Tanimoto M., Dosako S., Idota T. Use of compounds containing or binding sialic acid to neutralize bacterial toxins. European Patent. 1999;385:118. [Google Scholar]
  62. Joslin R.S., Erickson P.S., Santoro H.M., Whitehouse N.L., Schwab C.G., Rejman J.J. Lactoferrin supplementation to dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science. 2002;85:1237–1242. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74187-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kajikawa M., Ohta T., Takase M., Kawase K., Shimamura S., Matsuda I. Lactoferrin inhibits cholesterol accumulation in macrophages mediated by acetylated or oxidized low-density lipoproteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1994;1213:82–90. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(94)90225-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kawasaki Y., Isoda K., Shinmoto H., Tanimoto M., Dosako S., Idota T., et al. Inhibition by κ-casein glycomacropeptide and lactoferrin of influenza virus hemaglutination. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 1993;57:1214–1215. doi: 10.1271/bbb.57.1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kawasaki Y., Isoda H., Tanimoto M., Dosako S., Idota T., Ahiko K. Inhibition by lactoferrin and κ-casein glycomacropeptide of binding of cholera toxin to its receptor. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 1992;56:195–198. doi: 10.1271/bbb.56.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kent K.D., Harper W.J., Bomser J.A. Effect of whey protein isolate on intracellular glutathione and oxidant-induced cell death in human prostate epithelial cells. Toxicology in Vitro. 2003;17:27–33. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(02)00119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kinsella J.E., Whitehead D.M., Brady J., Bringe N.A. In: Developments in Dairy Chemistry. Fox P.F., editor. Vol. 4. Applied Science; London: 1989. Milk proteins, possible relationships of structure and function. (Functional Milk Proteins). [Google Scholar]
  68. Kobayashi T., Ohmori T., Yanai M., Kawanishi G., Yoshikai Y., Nomoto K. Protective effect of orally administering immune milk on endogenous infection in X-irradiated mice. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry. 1991;55:2265–2272. [Google Scholar]
  69. Korhonen, H. (1995). Whey as raw material for development of new products for human nutrition and health, a review. In Proceedings of NIF/NMR – seminar no. 252, Turku, Finland, 13–15, 1; NJF – report 102, pp. 207–219.
  70. Korhonen H., Marnila P., Gill H. Milk immunoglobulins and complement factors: A review. British Journal of Nutrition. 2000;84:S1–S7. doi: 10.1017/s0007114500002282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Korhonen H., Syväoja E.-L., Ahola-Luttila H., Sivelä S., Kopola S., Husu J., et al. Bactericidal effect of bovine normal and immune serum, colostrum and milk against Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 1995;78:655–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb03112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kosikowski F.V. In: Cheese and Fermented Milk Foods. Kosikowski F.V., editor. Edwards Brothers; New York: 1982. Whey and whey foods; pp. 446–469. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kruger M.C., Poulsen R.C., Schollum L., Haggarty N., Ram S., Palmano K. A comparison between acidic and basic protein fractions from whey or milk for reduction of bone loss in the ovariectomised rat. International Dairy Journal. 2006;16:1149–1156. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kuhara T., Iigo M., Itoh T., Ushida Y., Sekine K., Terada N., et al. Orally administrated lactoferrin exerts and antimetastatic effect and enhances production of IL-8 in the intestinal ephitelium. Nutrition Cancer. 2000;38:192–199. doi: 10.1207/S15327914NC382_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Laquerre S., Argani R., Anderson D.B., Zucchini S., Manservigi R., Glorioso J.C. Heparan sulphate proteoglycan binding by herpes simplex virus type I glycoproteins B and C, which differ in their contributions to virus attachment, penetration, and cell-to-cell spread. Journal of Virology. 1998;72:6119–6130. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.7.6119-6130.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Laursen I., Briand P., Lykkesfeldt A.E. Serum albumin as a modulator of the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Anticancer Research. 1990;10:343–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lin T.Y., Chu C., Chiu C.H. Lactoferrin inhibits enterovirus 71 infection of human embryonal rhabdomysarcoma cells in vitro. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2005;186:1161–1164. doi: 10.1086/343809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Loimaranta V., Laine M., Söderling E., Vasara E., Rokka S., Marnila P., et al. Effects of bovine immune- and non-immune whey preparations on the composition and pH response of human dental plaque. European Journal of Oral Science. 1999;107:244–250. doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Lonnerdal B., Iyer S. Lactoferrin, molecular structure and biological functions. Annual Reviews of Nutrition. 1995;15:93–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.15.070195.000521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Lubashevsky E., Krifucks O., Paz R., Brenner J., Savransky S., Trainin Z., et al. Effect of bovine lactoferrin on a transmissible AIDS-like disease in mice. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2004;27:181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2003.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Marchetti M., Trybala E., Superti F., Johansson M., Bergström T. Inhibition of herpes simplex virus infection by lactoferrin is dependent on interference with the virus binding to glycosaminoglycans. Virology. 2004;318:405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2003.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Markus C.R., Olivier B., de Haan E.H. Whey protein rich in α-lactalbumin increases the ratio of plasma tryptophan to the sum of the other large neutral amino acids and improves cognitive performance in stress-vulnerable subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2002;75:1051–1056. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/75.6.1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Masuda C., Wanibushi H., Sekine K., Yano Y., Otani S., Kishimoto T., et al. Chemopreventive effect of bovine lactoferrin on N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)-nitrosamine-induced bladder carcinogenesis. Japan Journal of Cancer Research. 2000;91:582–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2000.tb00985.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. McCormick J.A., Markey G.M., Morris T.C., Auld P.W., Alexander H.D. Lactoferrin-inducible monocyte cytotoxicity defective in esterase deficient monocytes. British Journal of Haematology. 1991;77:287–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1991.tb08572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. MacIntosh G.H., Regester G.O., le Leu R.K., Royle P.J., Smithers G.W. Dairy proteins protect against dimethylhydrazine-induced intestinal cancers in rats. Journal of Nutrition. 1995;125:809–816. doi: 10.1093/jn/125.4.809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Mercier A., Gauthier S.F., Fliss I. Immunomodulating effects of whey proteins and their enzymatic digests. International Dairy Journal. 2004;14:175–183. [Google Scholar]
  87. Micke P., Beeh K.M., Buhl R. Effects of long-term supplementation with whey proteins on plasma GSH levels of HIV-infected patients. European Journal of Nutrition. 2002;41:12–18. doi: 10.1007/s003940200001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Micke P., Beeh K.M., Schlaak J.F., Buhl R. Oral supplementation with whey proteins increases plasma GSH levels of HIV-infected patients. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2001;31:171–178. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2001.00781.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Mitoma M., Oho T., Shimazaki Y., Koga T. Inhibitory effect of bovine milk lactoferrin on the interaction between a streptococcal surface protein antigen and human salivary agglutinin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276:18060–18065. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101459200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Mitra A.K., Mahalanabis D., Unicomb L., Eechels R., Tzipori S. Hyperimmune cow colostra reduces diarrhoea due to rotavirus, a double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Acta Paediatrica. 1995;84:996–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13814.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Moon H.W., Bunn T.O. Vaccines for preventing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infections in farm animals. Vaccine. 1993;11:213–220. doi: 10.1016/0264-410X(93)90020-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Mulvihill D.M., Donovan M. Whey proteins and their thermal denaturation – a review. Irish Journal of Food Science and Technology. 1987;11:43–75. [Google Scholar]
  93. Na Y.J., Han S.B., Kang J.S., Yoon Y.D., Park S.-K., Kim H.M., et al. Lactoferrin works as a new LPS-binding protein in inflammatory activation of macrophages. International Immunopharmacology. 2004;4:1187–1199. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2004.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Ng T.B., Lam T.L., Au T.K., Ye X.Y., Wan C.C. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase, protease and integrase by bovine milk proteins. Life Sciences. 2001;69:2217–2223. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(01)01311-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Nishiya K., Horwitz D.A. Contracting effects of lactoferrin on human lymphocyte and monocyte natural killer activity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Journal of Immunology. 1982;129:2519–2523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Oevermann A., Engels M., Thomas U., Pellegrini A. The antiviral activity of naturally occurring proteins and their peptide fragments after chemical modification. Antiviral Research. 2003;59:23–33. doi: 10.1016/S0166-3542(03)00010-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Oho T., Mitoma M., Koga T. Functional domain of bovine milk lactoferrin, which inhibits the adherence of Streptococcus mutans cells to a salivary film. Infection and Immunity. 2002;70:5279–5282. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.5279-5282.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Okhuysen P.C., Chappell C.L., Crabb J., Valdez L.M., Douglass E., DuPont H.L. Prophylactic effect of bovine anti-Cryptosporidium hyperimmune colostra immunoglobulin in healthy volunteers challenged with Cryptosporidium parvum. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1998;26:1324–1329. doi: 10.1086/516374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. O’Neil T.E., Kinsella J.E. Binding of alkanone flavours to β-lactoglobulin, effects of conformational and chemical modification. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 1987;35:770–774. [Google Scholar]
  100. Oona M., Rägö T., Maaroos H.-I., Mikelsaar M., Loivukene K., Salminen S., et al. Helicobacter pylori in children with abdominal complaints: Has immune bovine colostrum some influence on gastritis? Alpe Adria Microbiology Journal. 1997;6:49–57. [Google Scholar]
  101. Ormrod D.J., Miller T.E. The anti-inflammatory activity of a low molecular weight component derived from the milk of hyperimmunized cows. Agents and Actions. 1991;32:160–166. doi: 10.1007/BF01980868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Parodi P.W. A role for milk proteins in cancer prevention. Australian Journal of Dairy Science. 1998;53:37–47. [Google Scholar]
  103. Patocka J., Jelen P. Calcium association with isolated whey proteins. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal. 1991;24:218–224. [Google Scholar]
  104. Payne K.D., Davidson P.M., Oliver S.P., Christen G.I. Influence of bovine lactoferrin in the growth of Listeria monocytogenes. Journal of Food Protection. 1990;53:468–472. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-53.6.468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Perez M.D., Calvo M. Interaction of β-lactoglobulin with retinol and fatty acids and its role as a possible biological function for this protein. A review. Journal of Dairy Science. 1995;78:978–988. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76713-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Perez M.D., Sanchez L., Aranda P., Ena J.M., Oria R., Calvo M. Effect of β-lactoglobulin on the activity of pregastric lipase. A possible role for this protein in ruminant milk. Biochemistry and Biophysics Acta. 1992;1123:151–155. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(92)90105-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Perraudin J.P. Proteines à activités biologiques, lactoferrin et lactoperoxydase. Connaissances recemment acquises et technologies d’obtention. Le Lait. 1991;71:191–211. [Google Scholar]
  108. Petrides P.E. Molecular genetics of peroxidase deficiency. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 1998;76:688–698. doi: 10.1007/s001090050269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Pintado M.E., Macedo A.C., Malcata F.X. Review: Technology, chemistry and microbiology of whey cheese. Food Science and Technology International. 2001;7:105–116. [Google Scholar]
  110. Potjewijd R. Lactoferrin, those extra benefits. The World of Ingredients. 1999:58–59. March/April. [Google Scholar]
  111. Poulsson M., Hegg P.-O., Castberg H.B. Heat-induced gelation of individual whey proteins. A dynamic rheological study. Journal of Food Science. 1986;51:87–90. [Google Scholar]
  112. Pruitt K.M., Kamau D.N., Miller K., Mansson-Rahemtulla B., Rahemtulla F. Quantitative, standardised assays for determining the concentrations of bovine lactoperoxidase, human salivary peroxidase, and human myeloperoxidase. Analytical Biochemistry. 1990;191:278–286. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90220-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Pruitt K.M., Reiter B. In: The Lactoperoxidase System, Chemistry and Biological Significance. Pruitt K.M., Tenovuo J.O., editors. Vol. 27. Marcel Dekker; New York: 1985. Biochemistry of peroxidase system, antimicrobial effect; pp. 143–178. (Immunology Series). [Google Scholar]
  114. Pruitt K.M., Tenovuo J. Kinetics of hypothiocyanide production during peroxidase-catalysed oxidation of thiocyanide. Biochemica et Biophysica Acta. 1982;704:204–214. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(82)90147-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Puyol P., Pérez M.D., Ena J.M., Calvo M. Interaction of β-lactoglobulin and other bovine and human whey proteins with retinol and fatty acids. Agricultural and Biological Chemystry. 1991;10:2515–2520. [Google Scholar]
  116. Reiter B., Harnulv G. Lactoperoxidase antibacterial system, natural occurrence, biological functions and practical applications. Journal of Food Protection. 1984;47:724–732. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-47.9.724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Reiter B., Perraudin J.-P. In: Everse J., Everse K.E., Grisham M.B., editors. Vol. 1. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1991. Lactoperoxidase, biological functions; pp. 144–180. (Peroxidases in Chemistry and Biology). [Google Scholar]
  118. Reiter B., Pickering A., Oram J.D., Pope G.S. Peroxidase-thiocyanate inhibition of streptococci in raw milk. Journal of General Microbiology. 1963;33:12–15. [Google Scholar]
  119. Roberts S.B., McMcrory M.A., Saltzman E. The influence of dietary composition on energy intake and body weight. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2002;21:140S–145S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2002.10719211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Rosaneli C.F., Bighetti A.E., António M.A., Carvalho J.E., Sgarbieri V.C. Efficacy of a whey protein concentrate on the inhibition of stomach ulcerative lesions caused by ethanol ingestion. Journal of Medical Food. 2002;5:221–228. doi: 10.1089/109662002763003375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Rowlands J.C., He L., Hakkak R., Ronis M.J.J., Badger T.M. Soy and whey proteins down regulate DMBA-induced liver and mammary gland CYP1 expression in female rats. Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:3281–3287. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.12.3281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Said H.M., Ong D.E., Shingleton J.L. Intestinal uptake of retinol, enhancement by bovine milk β-lactoglobulin. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,49. 1989:690–694. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/49.4.690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Sanchez M.S., Watts J.L. Enhancement of the activity of novobicin against Escherichia coli by lactoferrin. Journal of Dairy Science. 1999;82:494–499. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75259-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Santos J.A., Gonzalez C., Garcia-López M.L., Garcia-Fernández M.C., Otero A. Antibacterial activity of the lactoperoxidase system against Aeromonas drophila in broth, skim milk and ewes’ milk. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 1994;19:161–164. [Google Scholar]
  125. Sarker S.A., Casswall T.H., Mahalanabis D., Alam N.H., Albert M.J., Brussow H., et al. Successful treatment of rotavirus diarrhoea in children with immunoglobulin from immunised bovine colostra. Peadiatric Infectious Diseases Journal. 1998;17:1149–1154. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199812000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Schaller J.P., Saif L.J., Cordle C.T., Candler E., Winship T.R., Smith K.L. Prevention of human rotavirus-induced diarrhoea in gnotobiotic piglets using bovine antibody. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1992;165:623–630. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.4.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Schupbach P., Neeser J-R., Golliard M., Rouvet M., Guggenheim B. Incorporation of caseinoglycomacropeptide and caseinophosphopeptide into the salivary pellicle inhibits adherence of Streptococcus mutans. Journal of Dental Research. 1996;75:1779–1788. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750101101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Sharpe S.J., Gamble G.D., Sharpe D.N. Cholesterol-lowering and blood pressure effects of immune milk. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1994;59:929–934. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.4.929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Shin K., Tomita M., Lonnerdal B. Identification of lactoperoxidase in mature human milk. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2000;11:94–102. doi: 10.1016/s0955-2863(99)00082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Smith L.M., Fantozzi P., Creveling R.K. Study of triglyceride–protein interaction using a microemulsion filtration method. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 1983;60:960–965. [Google Scholar]
  131. Smith C., Halliwell B., Aruoma O.I. Protection of albumin against the pro-oxidant actions of phenolic dietary components. Food Chemistry and Toxicology. 1992;30:483–489. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(92)90099-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Sorimachi K., Akimoto K., Hattori Y., Ieiri T., Niwa A. Activation of macrophages by lactoferrin: Secretion of TNF-alpha, IL-8 and NO. Biochemical and Molecular Biology International. 1997;43:79–87. doi: 10.1080/15216549700203841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Sternhagen L.G., Allen J.C. Growth rates of a human colon adenocarcinoma cell line are regulated by the milk protein alpha-lactalbumin. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2001;501:115–120. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1371-1_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Superti F., Donelli G. Characterization of SA-11 rotavirus receptorial structures on human colon carcinoma cell line HT-29. Journal of Medical Virology. 1995;47:421–428. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890470421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Takada Y., Aoe S., Kumegawa M. Whey protein stimulates cell proliferation and differentitation in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Biochemistry and Biophysics Research Communications. 1996;223:445–499. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Takada Y., Matsuyama H., Kato K., Kobayashi N., Yamamura J.-I., Yahiro M., et al. Milk whey proteins enhance the bone breaking force in ovariectomized rats. Nutrition Research. 1997;17:1709–1720. [Google Scholar]
  137. Tanaka T., Kawabata K., Kohno H., Honjo S., Murakami M., Ota T., et al. Chemopreventive effect of bovine lactoferrin on 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide induced tongue carcinogenesis in male F344 rats. Japanese Journal of Cancer Research. 2000;91:25–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2000.tb00856.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Thomas E.L. Lactoperoxidase-catalysed oxidation of thiocyanate. The equilibrium between oxidised forms of thiocyanate. Biochemistry. 1981;20:3273–3280. doi: 10.1021/bi00514a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Thomas E.L., Bozeman P.M., Learn D.B. In: Everse J., Everse K.E., Grisham M.B., editors. Vol. 1. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1991. Lactoperoxidase, structure and catalytic properties; pp. 123–142. (Peroxidases in Chemistry and Biology). [Google Scholar]
  140. Tomita M., Todhunter D.A., Hogan J.S., Smith K.L. Immunisation of dairy cows with an Escherichia coli J5 lipopolysaccharide vaccine. Journal of Dairy Science. 1995;78:2178–2185. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76845-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Tong L.M., Sasaki S., McClements D.J., Decker E.A. Mechanisms of the antioxidant activity of a high molecular weight fraction of whey. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2000;48:1473–1478. doi: 10.1021/jf991342v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Troost F.J., Steijns J., Saris W.H.M., Brummer R.-J. Gastric digestion of bovine lactoferrin in vivo in adults. Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:2101–2104. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.8.2101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Tsai W.Y., Chang W.H., Chen C.H., Lu F.J. Enchancing effect of patented whey protein isolate (immunocal) on cytotoxicity of an anticancer drug. Nutrition Cancer. 2000;38:200–208. doi: 10.1207/S15327914NC382_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Tseng Y.-M., Lin S.-K., Hsiao J.-K., Chen I.-J., Lee J.-H., Wu S.-H., et al. Whey protein concentrate promotes the production of glutathione (GSH) by GSH reductase in the PC12 cell line after acute ethanol exposure. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2006;44:574–578. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Tsuda H., Sekine K., Nakamura J., Ushida Y., Kuhara T., Takasuda N., et al. Inhibition of azoxymethane-initiated colon tumour and aberrant crypt foci development by bovine lactoferrin administration in F344 rats. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 1998;443:273–284. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9068-9_34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Tsuda H., Sekine K., Ushida Y., Kuhara T., Takasuka N., Iigo M., et al. Milk and dairy products in cancer prevention: Focus on bovine lactoferrin. Mutation Research. 2000;462:227–233. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(00)00040-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. van der Strate B.W., Beljaars L., Molema G., Harmsen M.C., Meijer D.K. Antiviral activities of lactoferrin. Antiviral Research. 2001;52:225–239. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(01)00195-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Wakabayashi H., Takakura N., Yamaguchi K., Teraguchi S., Teraguchi S., Uchida K., et al. Effect of lactoferrin feeding on the host antifungal response in guinea-pigs infected or immunised with Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2002;51:844–850. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-10-844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Wakabayashi H., Uchida K., Yamaguchi K., Teraguchi S., Haysawa H., Yamaguchi H. Lactoferrin given in food facilitates dermatophytosis cure in guinea pig models. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2000;46:595–601. doi: 10.1093/jac/46.4.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Walzem R.L., Dillard C.J., German J.B. Whey components: Millenia of evolution create functionalities for mammalian nutrition: what we know and what we may be overlooking. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2002;42:353–375. doi: 10.1080/10408690290825574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Wang Q., Allen J.C., Swaisgood H.E. Binding of vitamin D and cholesterol to β-lactoglobulin. Journal of Dairy Science. 1997;80:1054–1059. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Wang H., Ye X., Ng T.B. First demonstration of an inhibitory activity of milk proteins against immunodefiency virus-1 reverse transcriptase and effect of succinylation. Life Sciences. 2000;67:2745–2752. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(00)00853-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Warme P.K.F., Momany A., Rumball S.V., Tuttle R.W., Scheraga H.A. Computation of structures of homologous proteins. α-Lactalbumin from lysozyme. Biochemistry. 1974;13:768–772. doi: 10.1021/bi00701a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Watanabe A., Okada K., Shimizu Y., Wakabayashi H., Higuchi K., Niiya K., et al. Nutritional therapy of chronic hepatitis by whey protein (non-heated) Journal of Medicine. 2000;31:283–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Weinberg E.D. The role of iron in cancer. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 1996;5:19–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Weng T.-Y., Chen L.-C., Shyu H.-W., Chen S.-H., Wang J.-R., Yu C.-K., et al. Lactoferrin inhibits enterovirus 71 infection by binding to VP1 protein and host cells. Antiviral Research. 2005;67:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2005.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Wever R., Kast W.M., Kasinoedin J.H., Boelend R. The peroxidation of thiocyanate catalysed by myeloperoxidase and lactoperoxidase. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1982;709:212–219. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(82)90463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Wolason L.M., Sumner S.A. Antibacterial activity of the lactoperoxidase system. A review. Journal of Food Protection. 1993;56:887–892. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-56.10.887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Wong C.W., Watson D.L. Immunomodulatory effects of dietary whey proteins in mice. Journal of Dairy Research. 1995;62:359–368. doi: 10.1017/s0022029900031058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. WuDunn D., Spear P.G. Initial interaction of herpes simplex virus with cell is binding to heparan sulfate. Journal of Virology. 1989;63:52–58. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.1.52-58.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Wu S.-Y., Pérez M.D., Puyol P., Sawyer L. β-Lactoglobulin binds palmitate within its central cavity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274:170–174. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.1.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Yamaguchi K., Tomita M., Giehl T.J., Ellison R.T. Antibacterial activity of lactoferrin and a pepsin-derived lactoferrin peptide fragment. Infection and Immunity. 1993;61:719–728. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.2.719-728.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Yi M., Kaneko S., Yu D.Y., Murakumi S. Hepatitis C virus envelope proteins bind lactoferrin. Journal of Virology. 1997;71:5997–6002. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.8.5997-6002.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Zapico P., Gaya P., de Paz M., Nunez M., Medina M. Influence of breed, animal and days of lactation on lactoperoxidase system components in goat milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 1991;74:783–787. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78225-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Zapico P., Gaya P., Nunez M., Medina M. Activity of goat’s milk lactoperoxidase system on Pseudomonas fluorescens and Escherichia coli at refrigeration temperatures. Journal of Food Protection. 1995;58:1136–1138. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-58.10.1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Zhang X., Beynen A.C. Lowering effect of dietary milk-whey protein vs. casein on plasma and liver cholesterol in rats. British Journal of Nutrition. 1993;70:139–146. doi: 10.1079/bjn19930111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Food Research International (Ottawa, Ont.) are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES