Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 16;142(1):138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.10.010

Table 3.

Responses for optimization samples.

Run no. Formulation parameters
Responses
Excipient Ratioa Concentration (mg/mL) Yield (%) Moisture content (%) (n = 1) MMAD (µm) (n = 3) Morphology
1 Trehalose 0.2 10 47.8 5.6 2.93 ± 0.05 Smooth
2 Trehalose 0.5 20 39.2 4.7 2.81 ± 0.24 Raisin
3 Lactose 0.8 30 45.5 2.1 3.07 ± 0.03 Raisin
4 Lactose 0.8 10 19.5 1.5 2.25 ± 0.08 Raisin
5 Mannitol 0.5 20 48.9 0.5 3.25 ± 0.06 Raisin
6 Trehalose 0.8 10 19.3 2.2 2.76 ± 0.15 Raisin
7 Mannitol 0.2 10 34.6 0.5 3.41 ± 0.02 Smooth
8 Trehalose 0.5 20 39.4 4.0 4.21 ± 0.05 Raisin
9 Mannitol 0.5 20 43.9 0.4 3.07 ± 0.10 Raisin
10 Lactose 0.5 20 33.0 3.7 2.73 ± 0.27 Raisin
11 Lactose 0.2 10 41.8 7.0 2.92 ± 0.05 Smooth
12 Lactose 0.5 20 36.7 5.0 3.55 ± 0.13 Raisin
13 Mannitol 0.8 10 31.2 0.5 2.54 ± 0.45 Raisin
14 Trehalose 0.8 30 46.1 2.2 3.90 ± 0.06 Raisin
15 Mannitol 0.2 30 56.4 0.5 4.84 ± 0.12 Smooth
16 Mannitol 0.8 30 42.4 0.4 3.28 ± 0.10 Raisin
17 Lactose 0.2 30 44.9 4.8 5.36 ± 0.56 Smooth
18 Trehalose 0.2 30 51.3 5.1 5.62 ± 0.10 Smooth
a

Relative amount of NPs ( by weight) compared to the total amount of dry substance.