Skip to main content
. 2013 May 8;111(1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.04.002

Table 1.

Level of personal protective equipment (PPE) used for various work situations and procedures by Australian veterinarians in a survey in 2011.

Veterinary work situations and procedures PPE considered adequatea No PPE No. (%) Inadequate PPE No. (%) Adequate PPE No. (%) Total
1. Handling healthy animals Overalls/gown or gloves 254
(77.0)
0
(0.0)
76
(23.0)
330
2. Handling clinically sick animals Overalls/gown or gloves 140
(43.3)
0
(0.0)
183
(56.7)
323
3. Performing surgery Overalls/gown and gloves 9
(2.8)
56
(17.7)
252
(79.5)
317
4. Performing post mortems Overalls/gown and gloves 10
(3.1)
57
(17.8)
253
(79.1)
320
5. Conception and parturition procedures Overalls/gown and gloves 37
(12.8)
106
(36.8)
145
(50.3)
288
6. Handling animal feces and urine Overalls/gown and gloves 28
(8.5)
223
(67.4)
80
(24.2)
331
7. Performing dental procedures Overalls/gown and gloves and face shield/goggles 12
(3.9)
37
(12.1)
257
(84.0)
306
8. Treating dermatology cases Overalls/gown and gloves 166
(53.5)
25
(8.1)
119
(38.4)
310
9. Treating respiratory cases Overalls/gown and gloves 207
(67.0)
61
(19.7)
41
(13.3)
309
10. Treating gastrointestinal cases Overalls/gown and gloves 127
(40.4)
109
(34.7)
78
(24.8)
314
11. Treating neurological cases Overalls/gown or gloves 219
(71.3)
0
(0.0)
88
(28.7)
307
a

The assessment of adequate or inadequate PPE use was based on minimal (not ideal) PPE use recommendations from the National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians (Scheftel et al., 2010) and the Australian Veterinary Association Guidelines for Veterinary Personal Biosecurity (AVA, 2011) as evaluated by two of the authors (NKD and JAT).