Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 4;179(3):213–218. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.027

Table 2.

Number of samples for each treatment group that tested positive for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) with RT-PCR for the disinfectants tested in the presence and absence of a 10% (v/v) fecal slurry at three different temperatures. Each treatment was tested in triplicate.

37 °C
4 °C
−20 °C
Disinfectant Cell culture medium Fecal slurry Cell culture medium Fecal slurry Cell culture medium Fecal slurry
Quaternary ammonium 3 3 3 3 3 3
Phenol 3 3 3 3 3 3
Quaternary ammonium/glutaraldehyde combination 3 3 3 3 3 3
Oxidizing agent (0.5%) 0 3 3 3 3 3
Oxidizing agent (1%) 1 3 3 3 3 3
Oxidizing agent (2%) 3 3 3 3 3 3
Sodium hypochlorite (0.17%) 3 3 3 3 3 3
Sodium hypochlorite (0.52%) 2 2 3 3 3 3
Sodium hypochlorite (1.03%) 0 0 3 0 1 2
Sodium hypochlorite (2.06%) 0 1 0 0 2 1
Negative controls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Positive controlsa 3 3 3 3 3 3
a

Viable PEDV was recovered from the positive control samples but PEDV could not be recovered from any of the disinfectant treated or negative control samples when tested with virus isolation.