Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 4;29(3):717–756. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2013.03.015

Table 6.

Scoring system for early orientation and differentiation between natural and deliberate epidemics

Category Type of Variable Indicator Scorea
Cases (person) Qualitative Unusual/atypical disease/manifestation (symptoms/signs) or unexpected fulminant course of disease in humans and/or animals
Failure of patient to respond to usual therapy or illness in a population (human, animal) despite immunizations
Several unusual/unexplained syndromes coexisting in the same case without any other explanation
Quantitative Sudden unexplainable increase in the number of cases or deaths in human and/or animal populations
Morbidity and/or mortality higher than expected
Clustering of patients with fever and/or fever and respiratory symptoms and/or lymphadenopathy
Spatial distribution (place) Qualitative Disease with an unusual geographic distribution
Occurrence of a nonendemic (imported) or previously eradicated disease
Epidemiologic data suggesting a common exposure
Quantitative Simultaneous epidemics and/or epizootics occur at different locations
Time distribution (time) Qualitative Disease identified in the region for the first time ever or again after a long period
Disease with an unusual/atypical seasonal distribution
Quantitative Simultaneous occurrence of epidemics and/or epizootics
Explosive epidemics and/or epizootics with indicators on a point source origin
Totalb
a

Score each indicator as present/yes = 1 or absent/no = 0.

b

Total = 1–4, natural epidemic; 5–9, probable deliberate or accidental outbreak; 10–14, highly probable deliberate or accidental outbreak.

Data from Radosavljevic V, Belojevic G. Unusual epidemic events: a new method of early orientation and differentiation between natural and deliberate epidemics. Public Health 2012;126(1):77–81.