Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 25;33(4):869–889. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2019.07.001

Table 3.

Agents applied for treatment of humans with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in 2003

Agents
Ribavirin Ribavirin given at 1.2 g three times a day orally for 2 wk resulted in a drop in hemoglobin of >2 g/dL from baseline in 59% of patients, with evidence of hemolysis documented in 36%.83
Based on a higher dosage of ribavirin for treating hemorrhagic fever virus, patients with SARS-CoV infection in Toronto developed more toxicity, including elevated transaminases and bradycardia.61
Protease inhibitor Two retrospective, matched cohort studies have compared the clinical outcome of patients who received protease inhibitors (lopinavir 400 mg/ritonavir 100 mg) in addition to ribavirin, either as initial therapy within 5 d of onset of symptoms or as rescue therapy after pulsed methylprednisolone treatment for worsening respiratory symptoms; these were compared with historical controls who received ribavirin alone as initial antiviral therapy.84, 85
The addition of lopinavir/ritonavir as initial therapy was associated with reduced overall death rate (2.3%) and intubation rate (0%), in comparison with a matched cohort that received standard treatment (15.6% and 11%, respectively)85; there was also evidence of reduction in viral loads. Other beneficial effects included a reduction in methylprednisolone use and less nosocomial infections.84
However, the subgroup that had received lopinavir/ritonavir as rescue therapy fared no better than the matched cohort, and received a higher mean dose of methylprednisolone.86 The improved clinical outcome in patients who received lopinavir/ritonavir as part of the initial therapy is supported by the observations that both peak (9.6 μg/mL) and trough (5.5 μg/mL) serum concentrations of lopinavir could inhibit the virus.
Interferon In an uncontrolled study in Toronto, interferon-alfacon-1 given within 5 d of illness resulted in improved oxygen saturation, more rapid resolution of radiographic lung opacities, and lower rates of intubation (11.1% vs 23.1%) and death (0.0% vs 7.7%); however, the sample size was small (n = 9 vs 13) and confounded by the concomitant use of systemic corticosteroid.86

Data from Refs.61, 83, 84, 85, 86