Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 29;331(3):571–583. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00784-8

Table 1.

Frameshift efficiency for different mutants of group O of HIV-1

Frameshift efficiency (%)
Construct Description In vitro In cultured cells


Frameshift efficiency for regions of different length of group O
pHIV/O-87-LUC Long frameshift region 10.2 (100) 4.7 (100)
pHIV/O-60-LUC Short frameshift region 3.3 (32) 1.9 (40)


Frameshift efficiency for mutants of group O
pHIV/O-k/o-LUC Altered slippery sequence 1.0 (10) 0.2 (4)
pHIV/O-1.2-LUC Substitution (3′ strand of stem 1) 3.4 (33) 0.6 (13)
pHIV/O-1.12-LUC Substitution (stem 1 re-formed) 10.0 (98) 4.5 (96)
pHIV/O-DSL-LUC Deletion (minus stem 1 and its capping loop) 2.3 (23) 0.4 (9)


Frameshift efficiency for mutations impairing or re-forming the pseudoknot
pHIV/O-2.1-LUC Substitution (loop capping stem 1) 4.4 (43) 1.6 (34)
pHIV/O-2.2-LUC Substitution (downstream segment) 3.9 (38) 2.1 (45)
pHIV/O-2.12-LUC Compensatory (pseudoknot re-formed) 10.3 (101) 3.8 (81)
pHIV/O-ANT70-LUC Long frameshift region for subtype ANT70 of group O 4.0 (39) 2.2 (47)

All pHIV/O-LUC constructs contain the HIV-1 gag/pol frameshift region of group O MVP5180 (except for construct pHIV/O-ANT70-LUC). Mutants of the group O frameshift region are further identified by a short description recalling their characteristics (see details in Figure 3, Figure 4). For each (−1) construct, an in-frame (0) control was made to monitor the frameshift efficiency. The numbers between brackets represent the frameshift efficiency of each construct relative to pHIV/O-87-LUC, which is arbitrarily set at 100%. Results are the means of five to six independent experiments. Standard error on the mean was inferior or equal to 10%.