Table 3.
Effects of Social Support on Alcohol and Tobacco Use
| Outcome | Predictors | Model-1 |
Model-2 |
Model-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (SE) | β (SE) | β (SE) | ||
| Tobacco | Emotional Quality | −0.02 (0.09) | <−0.01 (0.09) | 0.04 (0.12) |
| Emotional Quantity | −0.06 (0.09) | <−0.01 (0.10) | 0.02 (0.11) | |
| Instrumental Quality | −0.01 (0.10) | −0.03 (0.10) | −0.06 (0.13) | |
| Instrumental Quantity | 0.02 (0.10) | −0.01 (0.10) | <0.01 (0.12) | |
| Alcohol | Emotional Quality | −0.08 (0.05)† | −0.09 (0.04)* | −0.02 (0.06) |
| Emotional Quantity | −0.11 (0.05)* | −0.08 (0.05)† | −0.09 (0.06) | |
| Instrumental Quality | −0.12 (0.05)* | −0.11 (0.05)* | −0.09 (0.06) | |
| Instrumental Quantity | −0.03 (0.05) | −0.02 (0.05) | 0.01 (0.06) | |
Note. Table showing the standardized regression coefficient from models predicting variation in alcohol and tobacco use with each type of social support. Model-1 includes no covariates. Model-2 controls for the effects of age, gender, and SES (education, income, work status). Model-3 additionally accounts for the joint effect of all forms of social support.
*
p<0.05,
**
p<0.01,
†
p<0.10.