Reference | Objective | Design | Evidence |
---|---|---|---|
Allewelt et al. [447] | Ampicillin/sulbactam vs. clindamycin + cephalosporin | RCT | 2B− |
Bartlett and Gorbach [448] | Penicillin G vs. clindamycin in anaerobic infection | RCT | 3B+ |
El Solh et al. [6] | BAL study of microbiology of NH patients | PCS | 4A+ |
Fernandez Sabe et al. [449] | Co‐amoxiclav in anerobic infection | PCS | 3B+ |
Gudiol et al. [450] | Clindamycin vs. penicillin | RCT | 2B+ |
Kadowaki et al. [442] | Ampiciilin/sulbactam vs. clindamycin vs. panipenem/betamiprom | RCT | 2B− |
Leroy et al. [44] | Study of ICU admissions | PCS | 4B+ |
Mier et al. [443] | PSB study of ICU admissions | PCS | 3B+ |
Ott et al. [452] | Comparison of moxifloxacin vs. ampicillin/sulbactam | RCT | 2C− |
Perlino [451] | Clindamycin vs. metronidazole | RCT | 3B− |