Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 11;17(10):1574–1580. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03413.x

Table 6.

 Performance of different assays in patients with influenza like illness

pH1N1 ELISA BD Directigen EZ Flu A + B
Positive Negative Positive Negative
Pandemic H1N1 (n = 91)a 84 7 64 27
Seasonal influenza A (n = 171)a 0 171 123 48
Non‐influenza A (n = 642)a 2 640 1 641
Sensitivity 1 (95% CI)         92.3 (84.8–96.9)         70.3 (59.8–79.5)
Sensitivity 2 (95% CI)                   NA         71.9 (64.5–78.5)
Specificity 1 (95% CI)          100 (96.4–100)                   NA
Specificity 2 (95% CI)         99.7 (98.9–99.9)         99.8 (99.1–99.9)
Predicted value    For 2009 pandemic H1N1    For total influenza A
PPV, % (95% CI)         99.1 (98.2–99.7)         99.5 (97.1–99.9)
NPV, % (95% CI)         97.7 (91.9–99.7)         89.5 (87.1–91.7)

NA, not applicable; NPV, negative predictive value; pH1N1, pandemic (H1N1) 2009; PPV, positive predictive value.

Sensitivity 1: sensitivity in pandemic H1N1 patients. Sensitivity 2: sensitivity in seasonal influenza A patients. Specificity 1: specificity in seasonal influenza A patients. Specificity 2: specificity in non‐influenza A patients.

aData are no. positive/no. negative.