Table 1.
Nonexhaustive list of commercially available US Food and Drug Administration– and Conformité Européenne–approved point-of-care tests in infectious diseases classified by syndrome or disease of interest
Syndrome or disease | Specific test, duplex or panel | Targeted pathogens | Technique | Clinical specimen types | Trade names of some available assays | Test performance characteristicsa |
Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | Specificity | TAT (minutes) | |||||||
Upper respiratory tract infections | Specific | Group A Streptococcus | LFIA | Pharyngeal swabs | Sofia StrepA FIA |
84.9% | 96.8% | 5 | [4] |
Specific | Group A Streptococcus | LFIA | Pharyngeal swabs | TestPack Strep A | 75.3% | 98.1% | 5 | [4] | |
Specific | Group A Streptococcus | rPCR | Pharyngeal swabs | AmpliVue GAS Assay | 98.3% | 93.2% | 60 | [5] | |
Specific | Group A Streptococcus | rPCR | Pharyngeal swabs | cobas Liat Strep A Assay | 95.5% | 99.3% | 15 | [6] | |
Specific | Group A Streptococcus | rPCR | Pharyngeal swabs | Xpert Xpress Strep A | 100% | 79.3% | 25 | [7] | |
Lower respiratory tract infections | Specific | Streptococcus pneumoniae | LFIA | Urine samples | Sofia S. pneumoniae FIA | 66% | 100% | 10 | [8] |
Specific | S. pneumoniae | LFIA | Urine samples | BinaxNow Streptococcus pneumoniae Antigen Card | 62% | 98% | 15 | [8] | |
Specific | Legionella pneumophila | LFIA | Urine samples | BinaxNOW Legionella Urinary Antigen Card | 79.7% | 97.1% | 15 | [9] | |
Specific | Mycoplasma pneumoniae | LAMP | Throat swabs | Illumigene Mycoplasma Direct DNA amplification assay | 87% | 97.9% | 60 | [10] | |
Specific | Influenza A and B | rRT-PCR | NP swabs | cobas Influenza A/B assay | IA: 97.5% IB: 96.9% |
IA: 97.9% IB: 97.9% |
20 | [11] | |
Specific | Influenza A and B | rRT-PCR | NP swabs | ID NOW INFLUENZA A & B (formerly Alere i. Influenza A & B) | NA | NA | 15 | [12] | |
Specific | Influenza A and B | LFIA | Nasal swabs, NP swabs, NP aspirate/wash | Sofia influenza A + B FIA | IA: 82.2% IB: 77.8% |
IA: 100% IB: 100% |
15 | [13] | |
Specific | RSV | rRT-PCR | NP swabs/aspirate | ID NOW RSV (formerly Alere I RSV) | 100% | 97% | 15 | [14] | |
Panel | Influenza A/B, RSV | rRT-PCR | NP swabs | cobas Influenza A/B & RSV | NA | NA | 20 | [15] | |
Panel | Influenza A/B, RSV | rRT-PCR | Nasal wash fluid samples/aspirates and NP swabs | Xpert Flu/RSV XC | NA | NA | 40 | [16] | |
Panel | Human adenovirus, human metapneumovirus, rhinovirus/enterovirus, influenza A/B, parainfluenza, RSV, Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae | r(RT-)PCR | NP swabs | BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel | NA | NA | 65 | [17,18] | |
Panel | Human adenovirus, coronavirus, human metapneumovirus, rhinovirus/enterovirus, influenza A/B, parainfluenza, RSV, MERS-Cov, Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Bordetella parapertussis | r(RT-)PCR | NP swabs | BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Pane12 plus (RP2plus) | NA M. pneumoniae: 95.8% |
NA M. pneumoniae: 99.7% |
45 | [19] | |
Panel | Human adenovirus, coronavirus, human metapneumovirus, human rhinovirus/enterovirus, influenza A/B, parainfluenza, RSV-A/-B, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae |
r(RT-)PCR | NP swabs | ePlex Respiratory Pathogen (RP) Panel | NA | NA | 90 | [20] | |
Gastro-intestinal infections | Specific | Clostridium difficile | rPCR | Stool samples | Xpert C. difficile BT | 21.5% | 100% | 47 | [21,22] |
Specific | C. difficile | rPCR | Stool samples | cobas Cdiff test | 92.9% | 98.7% | 20 | [23] | |
Specific | C. difficile | EIA | Stool samples | Xpect C. difficile Toxin A/B Test | 48% | 84% | 20 | [24] | |
Specific | C. difficile | EIA | Stool samples | VIDAS C. difficile GDH and VIDAS C. difficile Toxin A & B | 80–89.8% | 96.7–97.3% | 50 | [25] | |
Panel |
Campylobacter (jejuni, coli and upsaliensis), Clostridium difficile (toxin A/B), Plesiomonas shigelloides, Salmonella, Yersinia enterocolitica Vibrio (parahaemolyticus, vulnificus, cholerae), Escherichia coli O157, enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) lt/st, Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) stx1/stx2E. coli O157, Shigella/enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), adenovirus F 40/41, astrovirus, norovirus GI/GII, rotavirus A, sapovirus (I,II, IV, and V), Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora cayetanensis, Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia |
rPCR | Stool samples | BioFire FilmArray GI Panel | 100% for 12/22 targets ≥94.5% for an additional 7/22 targets |
≥97.1% for all panel targets | 60 | [26] | |
Central nervous system infections | Duplex | Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus gattii | LFIA | Serum, CSF samples | CrAg LFA | 100% | 99.8% | 20 | [27] |
Specific | S. pneumoniae | LFIA | CSF samples | BinaxNow Streptococcus pneumoniae Antigen Card | 95.4–100% | 100% | 15 | [28] | |
Specific | Enterovirus | rRT-PCR | CSF samples | NucliSENS EasyQ Enterovirus v1.1 | NA | NA | 120 | [29] | |
Panel | E. coli K1, Haemophilus influenzae, Listeria monocytogenes, Neisseria meningitidis, S. pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, enterovirus, HSV-1/2, VZV, CMV, HHV-6, human parechovirus, C. neoformans/C. gattii | r(RT-)PCR | CSF samples | BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel |
E. coli K1: 100% Haemophilus influenzae: 100% (n = 1) L. monocytogenes: NA N. meningitidis: NA S. agalactiae: 0% (n = 1) S. pneumoniae: 100% |
E. coli K1: 99.9% H. influenzae: 99.9% L. monocytogenes: 100% N. meningitidis: 100% S. agalactiae: 99.9% S. pneumoniae: 99.2% |
65 | [30] | |
Fever in the returning traveller | Specific | Plasmodium spp. | LFIA | Whole blood samples | BinaxNOW Malaria | All patients 84.2% Patients without antimalarial therapy: 92.9% |
99.8% | 15 | [31] |
Specific | Plasmodium spp. | LAMP | Whole blood samples | Illumigene Malaria DNA amplification assay | 98.1% | 97.6% | 10 | [32] | |
Specific | Dengue virus | EIA | Plasma, serum samples | NS1 Ag detectionb | [33] | ||||
|
52% | 77% | 30 | ||||||
|
40% | 76% | 30 | ||||||
|
60% | 75% | 20 | ||||||
|
59% | 78% | 20 | ||||||
IgM detection | |||||||||
|
63% | 91% | 20 | ||||||
|
46% | 86% | 30 | ||||||
|
89% | 80% | 20 | ||||||
Sexually transmitted infections | Duplex | Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae | rPCR | Vaginal/endocervical and urine samples | Xpert CT/NG |
C. trachomatis in female endocervical, vaginal, urine samples: 97.4%, 98.7%, 97.6% C. trachomatis in male urine samples: 97.5% N. gonorrhoeae in female subjects in endocervical, vaginal, urine samples: 100%, 100%, 95.6% N. gonorrhoeae in male urine samples: 98% |
C. trachomatis in female and male samples: ≥99.4% N. gonorrhoeae in female and male samples: ≥99.8% |
90 | [34] |
Duplex | C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae | rPCR | Endocervical and ureteral samples | Gen-Probe PACE2C system for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea | 96.3% | 98.8% | 95 | [35] | |
Specific | Treponema pallidum | LFIA | Serum, plasma, whole blood samples | DETERMINE SYPHILIS TP | 95.6–98.4% | 97.3–95.7% | 15 | [36] | |
Specific | T. pallidum | LFIA | Serum, plasma, whole blood samples | VisiTect Syphilis | 57% | 99% | 30 | [37] | |
Specific | T. pallidum | LFIA | Serum, plasma, whole blood samples | Syphicheck-WB | 67.4% | 98.4% | 15 | [38] | |
Specific | HIV | Blood samples | Antibody detection | (sensitivity for HIV-1 M Ab) | [39] | ||||
|
100% | 98.5% | 20 | ||||||
|
100% | 100% | 30 | ||||||
|
100% | 100% | Immediately | ||||||
|
100% | 100% | 20 | ||||||
Antibody/antigen detection | 99.5% | 99.5% | 30 | ||||||
|
100% | Antigen p24: 99.5% Antibodies: 100% |
40 |
CMV, cytomegalovirus; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; FIA, fluorescent immunoassay; HSV, herpes simplex virus; LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification; LFIA, lateral flow immunoassay; NA, not applicable; NP, nasopharyngeal; r(RT-)PCR, real-time (reverse transcription-)polymerase chain reaction; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SSTI, skin and soft tissue infection; TAT, turnaround time; VZV, varicella zoster virus.
The performance characteristics of the assays are described as sensitivity and specificity according to published clinical validation studies when available. In the absence of test comparison against a reference standard assay, the reported positive and negative percentage agreement in the clinical studies reviewed were not reported to avoid misinterpretation.
Sensitivity has been extracted from the ‘acute infection’ population and specificity has been extracted from the ‘naive individuals’ population described in the corresponding reference.