Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 20;22(5):456.e1–456.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.12.008

Table 1.

Declared practices of hygiene and analysis of viral contamination of MPs used by healthcare workers at the University Hospital of Saint-Étienne, France

Practice Paediatric ward
Adult ward
p
Paramedical staff Medical staff Paramedical staff Medical staff
Use of MP (personal or professional) at hospital (%) 20/22 (90.9%) 33/34 (97.1%) 33/37 (89.2%) 21/21 (100%) NS
 PMP 4/20 (20.0%) 17/33 (51.5%) 6/33 (18.2%) 16/21 (76.2%) <0.0001a
 DECT 18/20 (90.0%) 29/33 (87.9%) 32/33 (97.0%) 20/21 (95.2%) NS
Use of MP (personal or professional) during care (%) 9/22 (40.9%) 18/34 (52.9%) 28/37 (75.7%) 18/21 (85.7%) <0.001b
 Hand hygiene never performed before its use 3/9 (33.3%) 5/18 (27.8%) 8/28 (28.6%) 5/18 (27.8%) NS
 Hand hygiene never performed after its use 3/9 (33.3%) 6/18 (33.3%) 11/28 (39.3%) 7/18 (38.9%) NS
Never disinfect their MP (personal or professional)
 PMP 1/4 (25.0%) 4/17 (23.5%) 2/6 (33.3%) 6/16 (37.5%) NS
 DECT 10/18 (55.6%) 15/29 (51.7%) 5/32 (15.6%) 8/20 (40.0%) <0.005b
Halt care provision to answer a call on MP (own or shared) (%) 9/22 (40.9%) 25/34 (73.5%) 25/37 (67.6%) 19/21 (90.5%) <0.005a
 Hand hygiene never performed after its use in this context 1/9 (11.1%) 4/25 (20.0%) 8/25 (32.0%) 5/19 (26.3%) NS
Detection of virus on at least one MPc 10/15 (66.7%) 19/34 (55.9%) 1/19 (3.4%) 7/21 (33.3%) <0.0005b
 PMP 3/3 (100%) 5/12 (41.7%) 0/3 (0%) 5/11 (45.5%) NS
 DECT 7/12 (58.3%) 14/22 (63.6%) 1/16 (6.3%) 2/10 (20%) <0.05b

DECT, digital enhanced cordless telephone; MP, mobile phone; PMP, personal mobile phone.

a

Medical vs. paramedical staff, whatever the department.

b

Paediatric vs. adult ward.

c

In the 89 healthcare workers who provided sampling of at least one MP at the time of interview.