Table 2.
Strengths and limitations of vaccination of animals as a means to control of zoonotic diseases.
| Framework (See Table 1) | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| I | Benefits to human and animal health | DIVA requirements |
| Potential for accelerated development of new vaccines | Liability concerns | |
| Collaborations between animal and human health industry | Segregated regulatory pathways | |
| Reduced development costs | Inadvertent exposure of humans to live vaccines | |
| Additional models for Animal Rule Lack of commercial incentive |
||
| II | New approaches to disease control | DIVA requirements |
| Benefits to human and animal health | Wild animal reservoirs | |
| Short development times and relatively low cost | Persistent environmental source of infection | |
| Accelerated regulatory pathway | Durability of immune response | |
| Potential for disease control without need for human vaccines | inadvertent exposure of humans to live vaccines | |
| Collaborations between animal and human health industry | Low commercial value, reliance on government funding | |
| Improved food safety | Feral animals or small farm operations inaccessible to vaccination | |
| High vaccine coverage required for herd immunity | ||
| III | New approaches to disease control | GMO issues |
| Control of infections acquired from wild animals | Safety for non-target species | |
| Accelerated regulatory pathway | Role of animals other than target species in transmission | |
| Potential for disease control without need for human vaccines | Very high or very low target species density | |
| Collaborations between animal and human health industry | Difficulty in designing and delivering oral vaccines | |
| Control of wildlife diseases | Vaccine stability under conditions of use | |
| Low commercial value, reliance on government funding | ||