Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 26;33(51):7370–7374. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.043

Table 2.

Safety test of K40/09 HP50 compared with the K40/09 parent and K40/09 HP40 in 1-day-old SPF chicks.

Administration methoda Treatment Mortality (%) Mean ciliostasis scoresb Histopathologic lesion scoresc
Upper trachea Middle trachea Lower trachea Kidney
Control PBS 0/10 (0) 0.1 0 0 0 0.3
Intraocularly K40/09 (Parent) 4/10 (40) 2.6*** 1.3* 1.5* 1.2* 2.8***
K40/09 HP40 0/10 (0) 1.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 2.9***
K40/09 HP50 0/10 (0) 1.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.9
Fine spray K40/09 (Parent) 4/10 (40) 3.3††† 1.9 2.6††† 1.9 2.8†††
K40/09 HP40 0/10 (0) 3.2††† 2 1.7 1.2 2.2†††
K40/09 HP50 0/10 (0) 1.8 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.5
a

One-day-old SPF chicks were inoculated with IBV (104.0 EID50/bird) by eyedrop or fine spray (droplet size = 50 μm).

b

On day 5 post-vaccination, tracheas were removed from five chickens in each group. Ten trachea rings per chick were prepared (three upper, four middle, and three lower). The rings were examined under low-power magnification and ciliary activity was scored as follows: 0, no ciliostasis; 1, 25% ciliostasis; 2, 50% ciliostasis; 3, 75% ciliostasis; 4, 100% ciliostasis.

c

Histopathology of the trachea and kidney at 5 days post-vaccination with IBV is reported as histopathologic lesion scores. 0, normal; 1, extensively focal lesions, 2, multifocal lesions; 3, diffuse lesions.

*

p < 0.05, by two-tailed t-test, compared to the K40/09 HP50 intraocularly vaccinated group.

***

p < 0.001, by two-tailed t-test, compared to the K40/09 HP50 intraocularly vaccinated group.

p < 0.05, by two-tailed t-test, compared to the K40/09 HP50 vaccinated group by fine spray method.

†††

p < 0.001, by two-tailed t-test, compared to the K40/09 HP50 vaccinated group by fine spray method.