Table 5.
The frequency distribution and profiles of the five types of respondents (sample t1).
| Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | Type 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 294 | 84 (28.6%) | 24 (8.2%) | 18 (6.1%) | 123 (41.8%) | 45 (15.3%) |
| Marital status | 53/30 | 14/9 | 13/5 | 56/66 | 17/28 |
| Sense of control | 3.33 (1.07) | 3.63 (1.28) | 4.28 (1.02) | 3.95 (.95) | 4.09 (1.04) |
| Personal avertibility | 3.17 (1.14) | 3.33 (1.31) | 3.50 (1.04) | 3.76 (.98) | 4.20 (.97) |
| Magnitude of aversion | 2.87 (.99) | 3.29 (1.04) | 3.72 (.96) | 3.59 (.79) | 4.16 (.85) |
| W1 | 2.22 (.59) | 2.25 (.74) | 1.89 (.58) | 1.94 (.39) | 1.27 (.50) |
| W2 | 4.06 (.70) | 4.13 (.99) | 3.56 (1.15) | 3.76 (.84) | 3.78 (1.11) |
W1: Respondent's willingness to patronize regular restaurant dining services in a given context of next epidemic.
W2: In the given situation, respondent's willingness to patronize a value-enhanced package of dining services (i.e., 30-percent-off dining services in a disinfection certified restaurant).
Note: There are values of frequency distribution, frequency ratio or mean/standard deviation of corresponding variables shown in the columns across the five types.