Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 9;36(2):215–270. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12308

Table 6‐1.

Options of 3D image integration

Type of imaging Advantage Disadvantage
Contrast CT

Quick scanning time

Widely available

Easy 3D reconstruction on all software packages

Contrast exposure and transit times may be long due to the reduced cardiac output resulting in high‐radiation burden
Noncontrast CMR

Nonstandard sequence in many laboratories

Unlimited field of view (allows to scan from neck to groins to assess access options)

No radiation burden

More difficult and time‐consuming to 3D reconstruct on the available 3D software packages

No resolution within stents or close to metallic objects

Implantable devices (even when conditional) may cause artefacts

ICE Excellent 3D reconstructions of any given 3D anatomy

Requires intracardiac access

Expertise may be difficult to obtain in CHD

3D TTE or TEE

Increasingly available

Popular tool in interventional procedures

Stand‐alone 3D reconstructions not directly integrated in 3D mapping

TEE requires general anesthesia and intubation if performed throughout the entire procedure

3D, three‐dimensional; CHD, congenital heart disease; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; CT, computed tomography; ICE, intracardiac echocardiography; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography.