. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Oct 9;32(2):256–271. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01478

Table 5.

Enter regression models for task performance. Posterior models included posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG) and posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG), frontal models included inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis (IFGop) and inferior frontal gyrus pars triangularis (IFGtri). β=standardized beta.

Scores (n=104)	ROIs	β	t	F-value	Adjusted R²	p-value
Total score
Posterior				25.9	.326	<.001
	pMTG	−.52	−3.37			.001
	pSTG	−.07	−.47			.639
Frontal				1.8	.015	.171
	IFGop	−.31	−1.71			.090
	IFGtri	.19	1.01			.315

CAN
Posterior				8.7	.130	<.001
	pMTG	−.51	−2.89			.005
	pSTG	.15	.87			.384
Frontal				.2	−.016	.823
	IFGop	−.02	−.12			.907
	IFGtri	−.04	−.23			.819

Non-CAN
Posterior				30.1	.361	<.001
	pMTG	−.52	−3.47			.001
	pSTG	−.11	−.70			.484
Frontal				3.80	.052	.026
	IFGop	−.46	−2.08			.013
	IFGtri	.28	1.57			.120

Non-CAN residuals
Posterior				12.2	.179	<.001
	pMTG	−.10	−.59			.557
	pSTG	−.35	−2.08			.040
Frontal				7.0	.104	.001
	IFGop	−.64	−3.65			<.001
	IFGtri	.47	2.68			.009