Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 2;9:e14. doi: 10.1017/jns.2020.7

Table 3.

Association between fruit and vegetable intake and new cases of type 2 diabetes (T2D) among men and women based on logistic regression (n 35 307)

(Odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)

T2D new cases
Model 1 Model 2§ Model 3|| Model 4 Model 5‡‡
OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI
Men (n 14 718)
Vegetable intake
 ≥2 servings/d (ref.) 1·00 1·00 1·00 1·00 1·00
 <2 servings/d 2·08** 1·29, 3·36 1·89** 1·17, 3·05 1·78* 1·10, 2·89 1·68* 1·04, 2·74 1·62 1·00, 2·61
Fruit intake
 ≥2 servings/d (ref.) 1·00 0·74, 1·70 1·00 0·68, 1·56 1·00 0·74, 1·69 1·00 0·70, 1·61 1·00 0·69, 1·59
 <2 servings/d 1·13 1·03 1·12 1·06 1·04
F&V intake
 ≥4 servings/d (ref.) 1·00 0·77, 2·40 1·00 0·69, 2·17 1·00 0·72, 2·26 1·00 0·68, 2·14 1·00 0·66, 2·08
 <4 servings/d 1·36 1·22 1·28 1·20 1·17
Women (n 20 589)
Vegetable intake
 ≥2 servings/d (ref.) 1·00 1·10, 2·24 1·00 1·00, 2·06 1·00 0·83, 1·72 1·00 0·83, 1·72 1·00 0·82, 1·71
 <2 servings/d 1·57* 1·44 1·19 1·19 1·18
Fruit intake
 ≥2 servings/d (ref.) 1·00 0·71, 1·36 1·00 0·66, 1·28 1·00 0·67, 1·28 1·00 0·66, 1·27 1·00 0·65, 1·26
 <2 servings/d 0·98 0·92 0·92 0·91 0·90
F&V intake
 ≥4 servings/d (ref.) 1·00 0·87, 1·86 1·00 0·79, 1·70 1·00 0·75, 1·60 1·00 0·73, 1·58 1·00 0·73, 1·58
 <4 servings/d 1·27 1·26 1·09 1·08 1·07

ref., Reference group; F&V, fruit and vegetables.

Indicates level of significance: * P < 0·05, ** P < 0·01.

Borderline significant (P = 0·05).

Unadjusted.

§

Adjusted for weight status.

||

Adjusted for age (continuous) and education (categorical).

Adjusted for age, education and weight status (categorical).

‡‡

Adjusted for age, education, weight status, smoking, alcohol and physical activity.