Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb 2;35(1):38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.07.010

Table 5.

Factors associated with anticipated psychological responses if 2 to 3 new human-to-human and 2 to 3 new bird-to-human H5N1 cases were to be reported in Hong Kong in the next 12 months

>3 distress responses (onset of human-to-human H5N1 transmission)
>3 distress responses (onset of bird-to-human H5N1 transmission)
Row % ORu ORm Row % ORu ORm
Socio-demographic factors
 Gender
  Male 19.2 1.00 14.2 1.00
  Female 26.0 1.48 18.0 1.33
 Age groups
  18-39 years 20.7 1.00 15.2 1.00
  40-60 years 24.8 1.26 17.2 1.16
 Education level
  ≤Secondary Form 5 (11th grade) 22.9 1.00 16.2 1.00
  >Secondary Form 5 (11th grade) 22.9 1.00 16.8 1.05
 Marital status
  Ever married 25.7 1.00 ns 18.8 1.00
  Never married 18.1 0.64 10.1 0.49
 Employment status
  Not employed full-time 22.6 1.00 10.6 1.00
  Employed full-time 23.0 1.02 19.2 2.01
SARS experiences
 Self-rated emotional distress during the SARS epidemica
  ≤75th percentile 18.7 1.00 1.00 13.5 1.00 ns
  >75th percentile 41.1 3.02∗∗∗ 2.63∗∗∗ 29.4 2.66∗∗
Current immediate public health responses (last 3 months)
 Avoided visiting hospitals due to fear of avian influenza
  No 20.1 1.00 ns 12.6 1.00 1.00
  Yes 33.7 2.02∗∗ 32.1 3.29∗∗ 2.59
 Eating less poultry meat in the last 3 months
  No 18.5 1.00 1.00 12.0 1.00 1.00
  Yes 34.0 2.27∗∗∗ 2.33∗∗ 26.7 2.67∗∗ 2.13
Anticipated occurrence in the coming year
 Bird-to-human H5N1 occurring in Hong Kong
  No 20.5 1.00 17.4 1.00
  Yes 24.8 1.28 14.8 0.83
 Human-to-human H5N1 occurring in Hong Kong
  No 19.9 1.00 ns 14.2 1.00
  Yes 28.0 1.57 21.4 1.65
 Human-to-human H5N1 occurring in mainland China
  No 19.3 1.00 12.7 1.00
  Yes 26.0 1.47 20.9 1.82
 Human-to-human H5N1 anywhere
  No 22.4 1.00 1.00 12.6 1.00 ns
  Yes 25.3 1.77 1.61 35.4 1.92
Perceived susceptibility to contracting avian influenza
 Perceived susceptibility of one's family members to contracting avian influenza
  Low/very low/not certain 17.6 1.00 1.00 13.8 1.00 1.00
  High/very high 39.3 3.04∗∗∗ 3.08∗∗∗ 31.0 2.79∗∗ 2.63
Perceptions related to medical aspects of H5N1
 Has very high fatality rate
  Disagree/not certain 14.0 1.00 ns 9.0 1.00 ns
  Agree 25.9 2.16∗∗ 19.2 2.41
 Causes permanent physical damage to patients
  Disagree/not certain 18.1 1.00 ns 7.6 1.00 1.00
  Agree 26.8 1.66 24.2 3.89∗∗∗ 2.58
 Has symptoms similar to those of SARS
  Disagree/not certain 20.9 1.00 9.7 1.00 1.00
  Agree 25.2 1.28 25.2 3.13∗∗∗ 2.47
Preparedness of health authorities in Hong Kong
 Hong Kong would not have adequate vaccine
  Disagree/not certain 15.8 1.00 ns 11.3 1.00 ns
  Agree 27.0 1.97∗∗ 21.2 2.12
 Hong Kong would not have adequate medicine/treatment
  Disagree/not certain 16.2 1.00 1.00 13.5 1.00 ns
  Agree 28.5 2.07∗∗ 1.65 19.7 1.57
 Hospitals in Hong Kong would not have adequate infection control measures
  Disagree/not certain 18.2 1.00 ns 12.8 1.00 ns
  Agree 28.9 1.82∗∗ 22.6 2.00
Anticipated impact of avian influenza as compared with SARS
 Infectivity
  Better/same as SARS/uncertain 17.7 1.00 ns 14.4 1.00
  Worse than SARS 30.5 2.05∗∗ 19.0 1.40
 Impact on oneself & family
  Better/same as SARS/uncertain 18.6 1.00 1.00 13.0 1.00 ns
  Worse than SARS 35.7 2.44∗∗∗ 2.04∗∗ 28.1 2.61∗∗
 Economic impact on Hong Kong
  Better/same as SARS/uncertain 22.0 1.00 11.0 1.00 1.00
  Worse than SARS 24.3 1.14 28.3 3.20∗∗∗ 2.27
 Duration of the epidemic in Hong Kong
  Better/same as SARS/uncertain 21.0 1.00 16.4 1.00
  Worse than SARS 25.6 1.30 16.0 0.97
 Total number of affected persons in Hong Kong
  Better/same as SARS/uncertain 17.8 1.00 ns 13.5 1.00
  Worse than SARS 30.9 2.07∗∗ 22.3 1.85
 No. of items with “worse than SARS” responses
  0-3 19.1 1.00 ns 13.0 1.00 ns
  4-5 38.4 2.65∗∗∗ 33.3 3.35∗∗

ns = not significant.

— univariately nonsignificant.

ORU = univariate OR; ORm, ORs obtained from multivariate stepwise logistic regression using univariately significant variables as candidate variables; ns, not significant.

a

Respondents were asked to rate their level of emotional distress during the SARS epidemic on a 1-10 point scale. A higher score denotes a higher level of emotional distress and the 75th percentile is 7.

.05 < P < .01.

P < .05.

∗∗

P < .01.

∗∗∗

P < .001.

Anticipated psychological distress responses listed in Table 4.