Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 11;2013(7):CD009241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009241.pub3

Shennan 1995.

Methods Double blinded randomised controlled trial of oxytocin versus placebo.
Participants 93 Nulliparous women (46 intervention, 47 placebo) with epidural analgesia, > 35 weeks' gestation, singleton fetus in vertex presentation, 6 cm dilated or less.
Interventions Artificial rupture of membranes and oxytocin (initial dose 2 mU/min increasing to maximum of 32 mU/min) versus placebo.
Outcomes Duration of first and second stage, mode of delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, fetal condition (Apgar scores, intubation, nursery admission, cord pH).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Table of random numbers.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Coded ampoules of oxytocin or saline were prepared by pharmacy.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All data accounted for.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk This cannot be assessed as there was no published protocol or trial registration.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double blinded, unless slow progress noted and code was broken.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated.
Other bias Low risk None identified