Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 21;2014(8):CD002913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002913.pub3

Comparison 4. Budesonide 6 mg vs 3 mg.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Maintenance of Clinical Remissions 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 3 months 3 180 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.85, 1.34]
1.2 6 months 3 180 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.12 [0.85, 1.47]
1.3 12 months 3 180 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.85, 1.65]
2 Change in CDAI from baseline 3   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 3 months 3 180 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐15.11 [‐41.10, 10.88]
2.2 6 months 3 180 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐27.44 [‐52.09, ‐2.79]
2.3 12 months 3 180 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐26.42 [‐69.55, 16.70]
3 Mean Time to Relapse (days) 3 117 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 29.67 [‐4.83, 64.18]
4 Withdrawals Due to Treatment Failure 3 180 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.68, 1.16]
5 Proportion of Patients with Treatment‐Related Adverse Events at 12 months 3 179 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.60, 2.32]
6 Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events 2 111 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.08, 17.82]
7 Abnormal ACTH Stimulation Test 3 167 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.49 [1.00, 2.24]