Table 9.

Comparison of our current results with quantitative features¹⁹ for warped nodules.

Significance test	AUROC (standard error)	Accuracy (McNemar)
Quantitative features27 versus CNN1 ensemble of 3 clinical features	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.89 (SE: 0.0205)	76.79% versus 80.16%
	Significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN2 ensemble of 3 clinical features	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.83 (SE: 0.0258)	76.79% versus 77.21%
	Not significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN3 ensemble of 3 clinical features	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.9 (SE: 0.0195)	76.79% versus 80.01%
	Significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN1 ensemble of three clinical features + 6 mm size	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.89 (SE: 0.0205)	76.79% versus 81.89%
	Significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN1 ensemble of 3 clinical features + 6 and 16 mm size	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.9 (SE: 0.0195)	76.79% versus 83.12%
	Significant at $p=0.05$	Significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN1 ensemble of 3 clinical features + 6 and 8 mm size	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.89 (SE: 0.0205)	76.79% versus 81.89%
	Significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN2 ensemble of 3 clinical features + 6 mm size	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.87 (SE: 0.0224)	76.79% versus 78.05%
	Not significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN2 ensemble of 3 clinical features + 6 and 16 mm size	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.88 (SE: 0.0215)	76.79% versus 78.48%
	Not significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN2 ensemble of 3 clinical features + 6 and 8 mm size	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.87 (SE: 0.0224)	76.79% versus 78.05%
	Not significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN3 ensemble of 3 clinical features + 6 mm size	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.89 (SE: 0.0205)	76.79% versus 82.27%
	Significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN3 ensemble of 3 clinical features + 6 and 16 mm size	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.9 (SE: 0.0195)	76.79% versus 82.7%
	Significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$
Quantitative features27 versus CNN3 ensemble of 3 clinical features + 6 and 8 mm size	0.81 (SE: 0.0273) versus 0.87 (SE: 0.0224)	76.79% versus 82.7%
	Not significant at $p=0.05$	Not significant at $p=0.05$

Abbreviation: SE, standard error.