Table 4.
Post hoc Analysis: Odds Ratio of greater (vs less) LDKT pursuit or receipt of potential living donor inquiries according to participants' perceived LDKT knowledge or perceived LDKT information, stratified by cohort median age (52 y)
| Characteristic | N (%) | ORa (95% CI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Stages 3 or 2) vs Stage 1 | Donor inquiry (Yes vs No) | ||||||
| Age < 52 | Age ≥ 52 | P‐int | Age < 52 | Age ≥ 52 | P‐int * | ||
| 146 (49%) | 154 (51%) | 146 (49%) | 154 (51%) | ||||
| Perceived Knowledge | |||||||
| No knowledge or some knowledge | 185 (62%) | ref | ref | .54 | ref | ref | .04 |
| A great deal of knowledge | 115 (38%) | 1.08 (0.27, 4.31) | 2.71 (0.67, 11.0) | 2.14 (1.02, 4.50) | 0.67 (0.28, 1.58) | ||
| P‐value | .91 | .16 | .04 | .36 | |||
| Perceived Information | |||||||
| Not well informed or slightly well informed | 76 (25%) | ref | ref | .80 | ref | ref | .02 |
| Moderately well informed | 107 (36%) | 4.03 (0.73, 22.2) | 1.27 (0.35, 4.67) | 3.04 (0.94, 9.80) | 1.22 (0.46, 3.29) | ||
| Very well informed or extremely well informed | 117 (39%) | 2.70 (0.54, 13.5) | 2.37 (0.57, 9.78) | 4.70 (1.46, 15.1) | 0.57 (0.21, 1.55) | ||
| P‐trend | .27 | .23 | .01 | .24 | |||
a
Adjusted for potential confounders: age (continuous), sex (binary), education level (binary: less than or equal to a high school education vs greater than a high school education), income (binary: <$20K vs greater than or equal to $20K), health literacy (risk numeracy and health literacy scores, continuous), reported interest in LDKT (continuous), time since enrolling on the deceased transplant list (continuous), and years on dialysis (categorical).
*
P‐int = P‐value for interaction term.