Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;24(1):12–20. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040018.009

Table 1.

Characteristics and perioperative outcomes of the included studies

Year of publication
2012
2015
2016
2016
2016
2017
2018
2019
Study Matei et al. [4] Pokorny et al. [18] Martín Garzón et al. [19] Martín Garzón et al. [19] Pavan et al. [20] Zhang et al. [21] Johnson et al. [3] Nestler et al. [22]
No. of patients 35 67 79 76 130 32 12 35
No. of surgeons - 2 1 1 3 or more 2 2
Age (yr) 65.5 69 69.5 64.5 67.4 71 70 70.9
Mean operative time (min) 186 97 - - 150 274 157 182
Estimate blood loss (mL) or Hemoglobin change 121 mL 200 mL 390 mL 535 mL 250 mL -2.5 g/dL -5.4 % -1.5 g/dL
Duration of Foley catheter indwelling (day) 7.4 3 9.1 9.4 5 8 4 5
Hospitalization period (day) 3.17 4 - - 5 8 4 5
preoperative PSA (mg/dL) 5.44 6.5 6.7 10 6.1 6.4
Preoperative prostate volume (g) 106.6 129 80.3 75.5 118.5 121.5 94.5
Resection volume (g) 87.04 84 - - 77 110 61.2 77
Preoperative IPSS 28 25 22.7 20.9 23 - - 23
Postoperative IPSS 7 3 5.8 6.2 5 - - -
Transfusion rate (%) 0 1.5 6.3 6.3 9.4 3.3 9.4
Surgical route Transvesical - Millin (retropubic) Intrafascial Trans and extraperitoneal - - -
Major complication rate (%) - 4.5 3.9 1.2 2.3 3.1 7.5 -
Participation center (single or multi) Single Single Single Single Single Single Single -
Comparable study - - vs. LSP vs. LSP vs. LSP vs. HoLEP Learning curve vs. OSP, ThuVEP
Cancer detection rate (%) - - 5.06 26 0.8 - 11 -

IPSS, International Prostate symptom Score; LSP, laparoscopic simple prostatectomy; OSP, open simple prostatectomy; HoLEP, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; ThuVEP, thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate.