Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 6;132:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.024

Table 3.

Survey section 2: COVID-19 preventive measures.

Survey questions Answers All, n (%) n = 122 Red Zoneb, n (%) n = 39 (32) North, n (%) n = 26 (21) Centre, n (%) n = 18 (15) South and islands, n (%) n = 25 (20)
Triage processd for pts accessing oncologic services No 6 (5) 2 (5) 1 (4) 1 (6) 2 (4)
Yes 112 (95) 37 (95) 25 (96) 17 (94) 23 (96)
Which kind of pts are triageda All 79 (70) 24 (61) 24 (92) 10 (56) 14 (56)
Pts with fever 20 (19) 7 (18) 1 (4) 5 (28) 6 (24)
Pts with RSe 14 (12) 5 (13) 1 (4) 4 (22) 4 (16)
Pts with feverf + RS 8 (7) 8 (20) 0 4 (22) 5 (20)
Pts are questioned about feverf, RS and/or contact with high-risk subjects No 5 (4) 1 (2) 1 (4) 2 (11) 1 (4)
Yes 113 (96) 38 (97) 25 (96) 16 (89) 24 (96)
Diagnostic work-up for pts with suspicious symptoms No 39 (33) 9 (23) 6 (23) 9 (50) 13 (52)
Yes 79 (67) 30 (77) 20 (77) 9 (50) 12 (48)
Measures for reducing pts accesses from first cases of COVID-19 No 11 (9) 5 (13) 2 (8) 1 (6) 1 (4)
Yes 107 (91) 34 (87) 24 (92) 17 (94) 24 (96)
Which kind of pts are these measures addressed toa All follow-up visits (non-urgent) 98 (92) 30 (77) 24 (92) 15 (83) 22 (88)
Follow-up visits of high-risk ptsc 33 (31) 9 (23) 7 (27) 7 (39) 6 (25)
pts receiving adjuvant therapy 4 (4) 0 1 (4) 1 (6) 2 (8)
Alternative modalities to get in touch with pts (e.g. telephonic interview) No 23 (20) 10 (26) 3 (11) 4 (22) 4 (16)
Yes 88 (80) 25 (64) 21 (81) 14 (78) 22 (88)
Reduced access for pts coming from Red Zone, and/or reporting feverf and/or RS No 21 (18) 9 (23) 3 (11) 6 (33) 2 (8)
No, Red Zone out of catchment area 18 (15) 2 (5) 4 (15) 4 (22) 6 (24)
Yes 77 (66) 28 (72) 19 (73) 8 (45) 17 (68)
Reduced access for visitors and/or caregivers of pts in hospital ward, day hospital, outpatient visits No 0 1 (3) 0 0 0
Yes, limited access for one visitor per patient 59 (51) 23 (59) 10 (38) 9 (50) 14 (56)
Yes, denied access for visitors 50 (43) 13 (33) 15 (58) 9 (50) 11 (44)
Autonomous management of measures Yes 50 (43) 17 (44) 11 (42) 7 (39) 12 (48)
Medical direction measures 53 (46) 18 (46) 13 (50) 6 (33) 12 (48)
Regional measures 13 (11) 4 (10) 2 (8) 5 (28) 1 (4)
Measures for reducing pts accesses in view of actual legislationga No, internal measures already activated 61 (52) 22 (56) 12 (46) 9 (50) 16 (64)
Yes 59 (51) 19 (49) 16 (61) 9 (50) 9 (36)
Which kind of pts are these measures addressed toa All follow-up visits (non-urgent) 82 (92) 26 (67) 21 (81) 12 (67) 19 (76)
Follow-up visits of high-risk ptsb 26 (29) 9 (23) 4 (15) 3 (23) 8 (32)
Pts receiving adjuvant therapy 3 (3) 0 1 (4) 1 (8) 2 (8)
Did your Country provide guidelines for oncologic pts management during COVID-19 emergency? No 33 (28) 11 (28) 7 (27) 6 (33) 7 (28)
Yes 73 (63) 26 (67) 17 (65) 8 (45) 16 (64)
Only for hospital pts 10 (9) 2 (5) 2 (8) 4 (22) 2 (8)
How is your activity changing in view of actual legislationg? Significant decreased 28 (24) 9 (23) 6 (23) 7 (39) 5 (20)
Negligible decreased 70 (60) 23 (59) 18 (69) 9 (50) 15 (60)
Unchanged 10 (9) 5 (13) 1 (4) 1 (6) 2 (8)
Increased 0 0 0 0 0
UNK 8 (7) 2 (5) 1 (4) 1 (6) 3 (12)

BMI, body mass index; pts, patients; RS, respiratory symptom; UNK, unknown; COVID-19, novel coronavirus disease.

a

Questions with more than one possible answer.

b

Red Zone at the time of the survey includes the following Italian countries: Lombardia, Emilia Romagna and Veneto.

c

Age ≥75 years, cardiovascular and/or respiratory disease, chronic infections, diabetes, obesity (BMI ≥ 30), immune-suppressive therapies.

d

Patients triage includes: vital signs, and respiratory signs/symptoms evaluation.

e

Definition of fever: TC ≥ 37.5 °C.

f

Definition of respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, cough, rhinitis.

g

Administrative order issued on 11th March (refer text for complete details).