Table 1.
Design features | Proportion of schemes [Number of schemes] | |
---|---|---|
Measures of performance incentivised (N = 41) a | ||
Healthcare visits | 83% [34] | |
Quality of care (process) | 66% [27] | |
Health outcomes | 17% [7] | |
Quality of care (structural) | 27% [11] | |
Management practices | 22% [9] | |
Efficiency | 5% [2] | |
Whose performance measured (N = 41) a | ||
Individuals | 26% [10] | |
Groups of health workers | 3% [1] | |
Health facility | 76% [31] | |
Health system managers | 5% [2] | |
Who (ultimately) receives the payment (N = 38) a | ||
Individuals | 86% [32] | |
Groups of health workers | 3% [1] | |
Health facility | 46% [17] | |
Health system managers | 10% [4] | |
Payment attributes | ||
(N = 23) | Frequency | |
Monthly or weekly | 44% [10] | |
Bi-monthly or quarterly | 30% [7] | |
Every 6 months | 13% [3] | |
Annual or one-off | 13% [3] | |
(N = 11) | Median size | 10% of monthly income |
(N = 0) | Lag time | – |
(N = 41) | Reward versus penalty | |
Rewards | 98% [38] | |
Penalties | 2% [1] | |
(N = 3) | Coupled payments | |
Yes | 67% [2] | |
No | 33% [1] | |
(N = 34) | Use of money | |
Staff income | 56% [19] | |
Operating budget | 6% [2] | |
Both | 38% [13] | |
Basis for payment | ||
(N = 32) | Each action (e.g. visit) | |
Yes | 72% [23] | |
No | 28% [9] | |
(N = 32) | Threshold target (single target) | |
Yes | 28% [9] | |
No | 72% [23] | |
(N = 32) | Threshold target (multiple targets) | |
Yes | 9% [3] | |
No | 91% [29] | |
(N = 41) | Type of ranking | |
Relative ranking (tournament) | 5% [2] | |
Own performance (absolute) | 76% [31] | |
Own performance (improvement) | 19% [8] | |
(N = 41) | Payment adjustment | |
Equity | 22% [9] | |
Quality | 19% [8] | |
None reported | 59% [24] | |
Gaming safeguards | ||
(N = 41) | Performance audit | |
Yes (without penalties reported) | 61% [25] | |
Yes (with penalties) | 5% [2] | |
None reported | 34% [14] |
Note: a = multiple options possible