Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 6;18:95. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01332-0

Table 1.

Degree of model fit and measurement invariance of the competing models

χ2 df RMSEA Cfit of RMSEA CFI TLI Δχ2 Δdf ΔRMSEA ΔCFI ΔTLI
General model fit of the measurement models
Model 1: One-factor model (CFA) 1360.98 77 .103 <.001 .881 .859
Model 2: Two-factor model (CFA) 1010.80 76 .089 <.001 .913 .896
Model 3: Three-factor model (CFA) 532.12 74 .063 <.001 .957 .948
Model 4: Three-factor model (ESEM) 318.51 52 .057 .023 .975 .957
Model 5: Bifactor model (CFA) 336.07 63 .053 .208 .975 .963
Model 6: Bifactor model (ESEM) 224.07 41 .053 .196 .983 .962
Comparison of the measurement models
 Model 3 versus Model 5 228.61 11 .010 .018 .015
 Model 4 versus Model 6 119.25 11 .004 .008 .005
 Model 3 versus Model 4 265.53 22 .006 .018 .009
 Model 5 versus Model 6 161.87 22 .000 .008 - .001
Model fit in each group separately (Model 5: Bifactor model, CFA)
 Boys 197.70 63 .053 .272 .971 .958
 Girls 174.13 63 .047 .715 .983 .975
Measurement invariance testing (Model 5: Bifactor model, CFA)
 Configural invariance 370.85 126 .050 .506 .978 .968
 Metric invariance 388.20 150 .045 .928 .978 .974
 Scalar invariance 521.77 202 .045 .958 .971 .974
 Configural versus metric invariance 58.29 24 .005 .000 .006
 Metric versus scalar invariance 200.92 52 .000 .007 .000

χ2 Chi Square test statistics, RMSEA Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation, Cfit of RMSEA Closeness of fit test related to RMSEA, CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index, SRMR Standardized Root Mean Square Residual; Δχ2 Chi Square difference test. Chi Square test statistics and Chi Square difference test statistics are significant at least p < .05 level