Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):503–522. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00700-8

Table 1.

Rest-only ANOVA

Source dfeffect dferror F p ηp2
Modulator 1 22 4.26 0.051 0.16
Task stage* 1 22 6.33 0.020 0.22
Task stage × modulator 1 22 0.24 0.630 0.01
Memory ROI*** 1 22 18.16 0.000 0.45
Memory ROI × modulator 1 22 3.21 0.087 0.13
Reward ROI *** (GG) 3.03 66.72 31.93 0.000 0.59
Reward ROI × modulator* (GG) 3.03 66.72 3.78 0.014 0.15
Task stage × memory ROI 1 22 0.95 0.340 0.04
Task stage × memory ROI × modulator 1 22 0.01 0.932 0.00
Task stage × reward ROI 4 88 1.78 0.140 0.08
Task stage × reward ROI × modulator 4 88 1.15 0.339 0.05
Memory ROI × reward ROI** (GG) 2.84 62.46 4.36 0.008 0.17
Memory ROI × reward ROI × modulator (GG) 2.84 62.46 1.91 0.141 0.08
Task stage × memory ROI × reward ROI (GG) 2.50 55.05 2.17 0.112 0.09
Task × Memory × Reward × Modulator (GG) 2.50 55.05 0.23 0.842 0.01

The rest ANOVA examined memory structure (HIP, PHC), reward structure (ACC, MID, OFC, VS, MPFC), rest period (pre-encoding, post-encoding) and modulator status (modulator, nonmodulator).

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001