Table 2. Comparative Results for Primary and Secondary Outcomes Across Follow-up.
Outcome | Comparison Typea | Estimate (95% CI) | P Value |
---|---|---|---|
Coprimary outcomes | |||
Consultation rate per person per year | Adjusted risk ratio | 0.96 (0.56 to 1.66) | .89 |
Patient interval, d | Adjusted mean difference | −20.2 (−90.4 to 50.0) | NAb |
Secondary outcomes with validated scales | |||
Skin self-examination benefits score | Adjusted mean difference | 0.08 (−0.83 to 1.00) | .86 |
Skin self-examination barriers score | Adjusted mean difference | −0.29 (−1.83 to 1.25) | .71 |
Self-efficacy for consulting without delay | Adjusted mean difference | 0.20 (−3.69 to 4.10) | .92 |
Perceived risk of getting melanoma “higher” or “much higher” than other people | Descriptive results onlyc | NA | NA |
Perceived lifetime risk of melanoma | Descriptive results onlyc | NA | NA |
Sun protection habits score | Adjusted mean difference | 0.12 (−0.01 to 0.24) | .07 |
Additional secondary outcomes | |||
“Often” or “always” practiced sun protection in the past year | Descriptive results onlyc | NA | NA |
“Extremely likely” or “likely” to practice sun protection in the coming year | Descriptive results onlyc | NA | NA |
Sunburned at least once in the last year | Descriptive results onlyc | NA | NA |
Measures of possible harm | |||
Melanoma Worry Scale | Adjusted mean difference | −0.12 (−0.56 to 0.31) | .58 |
Short Form Health Survey, physical component summary | Adjusted mean difference | −0.31 (−2.39 to 1.76) | .77 |
Short Form Health Survey, mental component summary | Adjusted mean difference | 1.28 (−0.34 to 2.90) | .12 |
HADS Depression score | Adjusted mean difference | −0.43 (−1.19 to 0.33) | .26 |
HADS Anxiety score | Adjusted mean difference | 0.11 (−0.67 to 0.90) | .78 |
Abbreviations: HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; NA, not applicable.
All comparisons were intervention vs control.
No formal statistical testing for the patient interval outcome was performed because of differences in the rates of missing data between the control and intervention groups.
Because of small numbers of participants who provided data for this outcome, only descriptive results were calculated.