Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 12;22(2):366–374. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1620

Table 2.

Associations between breast cancer treatment and heart failure risk

Total Median value (IQR) Cases (n = 102) Controls (n = 306) RR Floating 95% CI P‐value
Model I: Model for all treatments considered simultaneously
Radiotherapy
Median [IQR] mean heart dosea (Gy) 6.8 [0.9–13.7] 3.9 [0.9–13.4]
Mean heart dose 0–1 Gy 0.4 [0.2–0.9] 28 (27.5) 96 (31.4) 1.0c 0.53–1.9
Mean heart dose 2–9 Gy 4.3 [3.8–6.6] 26 (25.5) 83 (27.1) 0.8 0.49–1.3 0.53
Mean heart dose ≥10 Gy 14.6 [13.6–17.0] 33 (32.4) 83( 27.1) 1.2 0.72–1.9 0.74
No radiotherapy 14 (13.7) 38 (12.4) 1.4 0.73–2.8 0.51
Mean heart dose unknownb 1 (0.9) 6 (2.0)
Chemotherapy
No chemotherapy 44 (43.1) 185 (60.5) 1.0c 0.60–1.7
CMF‐like 9 (8.8) 48 (15.7) 0.7 0.30–1.5 0.35
Anthracyclinese 33 (32.4) 60 (19.6) 6.9 3.5–13.6 <0.001
Anthracyclines and trastuzumabe 14 (13.7) 7 (2.3) 34.9f 11.1–110.1 <0.001
Other type of chemotherapy or type unknown 2 (2.0) 6 (2.0) g
Endocrine therapy
No endocrine therapy 65 (63.7) 241 (80.4) 1.0c 0.67–1.5
Tamoxifen 20 (19.6) 41 (11.6) 1.5 0.80–2.8 0.29
Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors 8 (7.8) 17 (6.0) 1.6 0.57–4.5 0.42
Aromatase inhibitors 8 (7.8) 5 (1.3) 4.0 1.0–16.3 0.06
Type of endocrine therapy unknown 1 (0.9) 2 (0.7) g
Model II h: Cumulative anthracycline dose by treatment with radiotherapy and trastuzumab i
No radiotherapy
Median [IQR] cumulative anthracycline dosej (mg/m2) 242 [230–302] 252 [241–302]
Total 14 38
No trastuzumab
0 mg/m2 11 (78.6) 33 (86.8)
≤240 mg/m2 231 [231–231]k 1 (7.1) 0 (0) g
>240 mg/m2 252 [241–302]k 1 (7.1) 5 (13.2) g
With trastuzumab
>240 mg/m2 302 [302–302]k 1 (7.1) 0 (0) g
Radiotherapy
Median [IQR] cumulative anthracycline dosej (mg/m2) 247 [240–319] 240 [240–300]
Total 88 268
No trastuzumab
0 mg/m2 43 (48.9) 203 (75.8) 1.0c 0.48–2.1
≤240 mg/m2 240 [221–240]k 9 (10.2) 26 (9.7) 3.3 1.5–7.2 0.02
>240 mg/m2 300 [252–360]k 23 (26.1) 29 (10.8) 8.6 4.7–15.6 <0.001
With trastuzumab
≤240 mg/m2 240 [240–240]k 13 (14.8) 10 (3.7) 25.3 9.7–65.9 <0.001
Model III e : Estimated mean heart dose by anthracycline and trastuzumab
No anthracyclines or trastuzumab
Median [IQR] mean heart dosea , b (Gy) 3.8 [0.2–14.2] 3.8 [0.4–14.2]
Total 54 236
0–1 Gy 0.4 [0.2–0.9] 9 (16.7) 60 (25.4) 1.0c , d 0.43–2.3
2–9 Gy 3.8 [3.8–5.4] 12 (22.2) 64 (27.1) 0.6 0.31–1.1 0.30
≥10 Gy 14.7 [14.2–18.0] 21 (38.9) 77 (32.6) 0.7 0.46–1.2 0.57
No radiotherapy 11 (20.4) 33 (14.0) 1.1 0.52–2.2 0.87
Mean heart dose unknownb 1 (1.9) 2 (0.9) g
Anthracyclines but not trastuzumab
Median [IQR] mean heart dosea , b (Gy) 6.9 [0.9–12.0] 0.9 [0.2–6.3]
Total 34 60
0–1 Gy 0.9 [0.2–0.9] 9 (26.5) 29 (48.3) 1.0c 0.42–2.4
2–9 Gy 6.4 [4.5–6.9] 13 (38.2) 17 (28.3) 1.2 0.55–2.8 0.70
≥10 Gy 15.2 [12.0–16.9] 10 (29.4) 5 (8.3) 2.8 0.89–9.0 0.15
No radiotherapy 2 (5.9) 5 (8.3) 1.2 0.27–5.6 0.82
Mean heart dose unknownb 0 (0) 4 (6.7) g
Trastuzumab
Median [IQR] mean heart dosea , b (Gy) 0.9 [0.2–0.9] 0.9 [0.9–6.4]
Total 14 10
0–1 Gy 10 (71.4) 6 (60.0)
2–9 Gy 2 (14.3) 3 (30.0) g
≥10 Gy 1 (7.2) 1 (10.0) g
No radiotherapy 1 (7.2) 0 (0) g
Model IV l : Joint effects of mean heart dose and anthracyclines
Mean heart dose <10 Gy, no anthracyclines 3.3 [0.4–3.9] 32 (31.4) 160 (52.3) 1.0c 0.66–1.5
Mean heart dose ≥10 Gy, no anthracyclines 14.7 [14.2–18.0] 21 (20.6) 77 (25.2) 1.1 0.59–1.9 0.85
Mean heart dose <10 Gy, anthracyclines 0.9 [0.4–5.0] 37 (36.3) 57 (18.6) 6.3 3.0–13.2 <0.001
Mean heart dose ≥10 Gy, anthracyclines 14.9 [12.0–16.8] 11 (10.8) 6 (2.0) 12.4 4.0–39.2 <0.001
Mean heart dose unknownb 1 (1.0) 6 (2.0) g

CI, confidence interval; CMF, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5‐fluorouracil; IQR, interquartile range; RR, rate ratio.

RRs for heart failure were estimated using logistic regression conditional on the matching variables.

a

In patients treated with radiotherapy.

b

Heart doses were unknown for seven patients (one case, six controls) because their radiotherapy charts were unavailable.

c

Reference category. CI for categorical exposure variables were estimated for each category, including the reference category, from the amount of information in that category.

d

P for trend across categories 0.48.

e

Anthracycline treatment consisted of an epirubicin‐containing regimen for 14/48 cases and 16/67 controls, and of a doxorubicin‐containing regimen for 34/48 cases and 51/67 controls. Trastuzumab was mostly given in combination with anthracyclines.

f

RR for anthracyclines plus trastuzumab vs. anthracyclines without trastuzumab is 5.5 (95% CI 1.9–16.0).

g

Insufficient numbers to produce reliable estimates for this category.

h

Model additionally included a dichotomous variable for endocrine therapy (no/yes).

i

Range cumulative anthracycline dose was 90–612 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalent, the commonest dose was four times 60 mg/m2. Two patients were treated with an anthracycline for breast cancer and then later retreated with an anthracycline for a recurrence or second malignancy. Cumulative anthracycline range for all other patients was 90–366 mg/m2. The commonest regimens were: AC (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide), FAC (5‐fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide), TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide), and FEC (5‐fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide).

j

In patients treated with anthracyclines.

k

Median anthracycline dose and IQR in patients treated with and without trastuzumab.

l

Model also included dichotomous variables for radiotherapy (no/yes), trastuzumab (no/yes), and endocrine therapy (no/yes).