Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 14;221(9):1416–1424. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz595

Table 3.

Cox Proportional Hazards Regression for Predictors of Unsuccessful Treatment Outcome (Death, Treatment Failure, and Tuberculosis Recurrence)

Participants Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Factor by Population Total, No. Poor Outcome, No. (%) Crude Adjusted
Primary analysis population
 HIV status
  Positive 102 18 (18) 6.14 (3.12–12.10)a 4.79 (2.10–10.91)a,b
  Negative 445 17 (4) Reference Reference
 Baseline weight (per 1-kg increase) 547 35 (6) 1.0 (.991.03) 0.99 (.961.02)c
 Weight at 2 mo (per 1-kg increase) 547 35 (6) 0.97 (.941.01) 0.97 (.941.01)c
 Absolute weight change (per 1-kg increase) 547 35 (6) 0.83 (.77–0.89)a 0.88 (.81–0.95)a,d
 Relative weight change (per 1% increase) 547 35 (6) 0.89 (.86–0.93)a 0.92 (.88–0.96)a,d
Full population
 HIV status
  Positive 117 25 (21) 5.63 (3.20–9.90)a 3.88 (1.81–8.34)a,b
  Negative 481 24 (5) Reference Reference
 Baseline weight (per 1-unit increase) 598 49 (8) 0.98 (.961.01) 0.98 (.951.01)c

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

aStatistically significant at P < .05.

bAdjusted for sex and hemoglobin level.

cAdjusted for HIV status, and sex.

dAdjusted for baseline weight, HIV status, and sex.