Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 28;2014(4):CD002901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002901.pub3

Dig captopril 1988.

Methods six‐mo multicenter parallel trial with third captopril arm; primary endpoint—ET; secondary endpoints—NYHA class, hospitalization, EF
Participants 196 pts; mean age 58; 83% male; 80% Class II; 87% on diuretics, none on beta‐blockers; mean EF 0.25; mean duration of HF 3.0 yrs; prior dig Rx in 68%; dx—61% ischemic, 31% cardiomyopathic
Interventions dig dosage of 0.125 to 0.375 mg/d titrated to serum levels of 0.7 to 2.5 ng/mL
Outcomes for dig versus pla, ET +10% & +6% (P value NS), EF +17% & +3% (P < 0.01); NYHA class improved in 31% of dig versus 22% of pla (P value NS)
Notes blind allocation—yes
 blinded to outcomes—?
 baselines comparable—yes
 loss to follow‐up—?
 dig titrated to level—yes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A—Adequate