Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 28;2014(4):CD002901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002901.pub3

Dig xamoterol 1988.

Methods Three‐mo multicenter parallel trial with third xamoterol arm; endpoints—EX, symptoms, signs
Participants 213 pts; median age 62; 38% male; 25% Class I, 62% Class II, 13% Class III; 22% on diuretics, none on ACEI or beta‐blockers; prior dig Rx in 46%; dx—unspecified in 76% of pts
Interventions dig dosage 0.25 mg/d, mean plasma dig level 0.87 ng/mL
Outcomes for dig versus pla, no significant difference in EX; symptoms: Likert but not VAS improved by dig; signs: edema & rales improved by dig, but not JVP or hepatomegaly
Notes blind allocation—yes
 blinded to outcomes—?
 baselines comparable—yes
 loss to follow‐up—?
 dig titrated to level—no
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A—Adequate