Handforth 1998.
Methods | Randomised, prospective, double blind, active‐control study. Pre‐randomisation baseline period: 12‐16 weeks. Duration of treatment: 16 weeks. This period included 2‐12‐16 week time‐points. |
|
Participants | A multi‐centre trial (USA). 198 people randomised. High stimulation group: 95 participants; mean age 32.1 years; 51.6% male and 48.4% female; mean seizures/day 1.59; mean duration of epilepsy 22.1 years. Low stimulation group: 103 participants; mean age 34.2 years; 42.7% male and 57.3% female; mean seizures/day 0.97; mean duration of epilepsy 23.7 years. |
|
Interventions | Comparison of high (on/off cycles of 30 seconds every 5 minutes, each "on" period consisting of 500 µs duration pulses at 30 Hz frequency) and low stimulation (on/off cycles of 30 seconds every 3 hours, each "on" cycle of 130 µs duration pulse at 1 Hz frequency) in treatment of refractory partial seizures. All patients had an identical implantation of the vagus nerve stimulation device (NeuroCybernetic Prosthesis, Cyberonics). |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome: Seizure frequency (50% reduction of seizures). Secondary outcomes: a) Dropouts. b) Adverse events. c) Cognitive impact (reported in Dodrill 2000 paper). d) Quality‐of‐life (QOL) impact (reported in Dodrill 2000 paper). |
|
Notes |
DODRILL 2000 Epilepsy and Behavior and AMAR A.P. 1998 Neurosurgery are linked to this study. Supported by a grant from Cyberonics, Inc., Webster, TX. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation schedule was generated by a statistical consultant before study initiation. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Telephone communication to obtain randomised treatment assignment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Study personnel and participants are blinded. Identical implants used. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The study data were analysed by a blinded interviewer. Identical implants used. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 4 patient withdrawals, but the reasons for exclusion are reported. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | All outcomes stated in methods section of paper were reported in the results. There was no protocol available to check to priori outcomes. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | All studies are sponsored by Cyberonics, the manufactures of the device. |