6. Enhanced patient referral versus simple patient referral, number of partners notified per index patient randomised, effect size.
Comparison |
N (studies) |
n (participants) |
Study ID |
MD (95% CI) |
Test for heterogeneity I2; Chi2, P value |
Home sampling kit vs. simple patient referral | 2 | 782 | Cameron 2009; Ostergaard 2003 | 0.01 (‐0.12 to 0.14) | 0%; 0.01, P value = 0.93 |
Additional counselling vs. simple patient referral | 2 | 272 | Moyo 2002; Wilson 2009 |
0.21 (0.05 to 0.36) data not available |
n/a |
Disease‐specific website vs. simple patient referral | 1 | 105 | Tomnay 2006 | ‐0.17 (‐0.68 to 0.35) | n/a |
Videotape vs. simple patient referral | 1 | 77 | Trent 2010 | data not available | n/a |
Enhanced patient referral group is taken as the experimental group. Mean difference (MD) < 0 indicates that simple patient referral resulted in more partners notified; MD = 0 indicates no difference between groups; MD > 0 indicates more partners notified in the enhanced patient referral group.
CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; n/a indicates not applicable.