7. Enhanced patient referral versus simple patient referral, number of partners treated per index patient randomised, effect size.
Comparison |
N (studies) |
n (participants) |
Study ID |
MD (95% CI) |
Test for heterogeneity I2; Chi2, P value |
Home sampling kit vs. simple patient referral | 1 | 200 | Apoola 2009 | ‐0.03 (‐0.25 to 0.19) | n/a |
Additional counselling vs. simple patient referral | 1 | 863 | Ellison undated | 0.04 (‐0.02 to 0.1) | n/a |
Patient referral (DIS) vs. patient referral (nurse) | 2 | 597 | Katz 1988; Low 2005 | ‐0.05 (‐0.13 to 0.03) | 0%; 0.71, P value = 0.40 |
Information booklet vs. simple patient referral | 1 | 633 | Kissinger 2005 | 0.22 (0.08 to 0.36) | n/a |
Videotape vs. simple patient referral | 1 | 12,677 | Trent 2010 | not reported | n/a |
Enhanced patient referral group is taken as the experimental group. Mean difference (MD) < 0 indicates that simple patient referral resulted in more partners treated; MD = 0 indicates no difference between groups; MD > 0 indicates more partners treated in the enhanced patient referral group.
CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; n/a indicates not applicable.