Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 3;2013(10):CD002843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002843.pub2

7. Enhanced patient referral versus simple patient referral, number of partners treated per index patient randomised, effect size.

 Comparison N
(studies)
n
(participants)
Study ID MD
(95% CI)
Test for heterogeneity
I2; Chi2, P value
Home sampling kit vs. simple patient referral 1 200 Apoola 2009 ‐0.03 (‐0.25 to 0.19) n/a
Additional counselling vs. simple patient referral 1 863 Ellison undated 0.04 (‐0.02 to 0.1) n/a
Patient referral (DIS) vs. patient referral (nurse) 2 597 Katz 1988; Low 2005 ‐0.05 (‐0.13 to 0.03) 0%; 0.71, P value = 0.40
Information booklet vs. simple patient referral 1 633 Kissinger 2005 0.22 (0.08 to 0.36) n/a
Videotape vs. simple patient referral 1 12,677 Trent 2010 not reported n/a

Enhanced patient referral group is taken as the experimental group. Mean difference (MD) < 0 indicates that simple patient referral resulted in more partners treated; MD = 0 indicates no difference between groups; MD > 0 indicates more partners treated in the enhanced patient referral group.

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; n/a indicates not applicable.