Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 3;2013(10):CD002843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002843.pub2

Levy 1998.

Methods Setting: US, poor, high‐crime urban area, neighbourhood‐based service in converted store front
Enrolment: over the first 12 months of the study ‐ 386 intravenous drug users were recruited by outreach team from the streets
Follow‐up: re‐interview 3 months later
Participants 60 HIV‐positive participants were randomised
Inclusion criteria
  • Injecting drug users

  • HIV positive and receiving results

  • Have needle‐sharing partners or sexual partners

Interventions All index patients receive referral to case management services, help in identifying and naming at‐risk partners, reasons to inform their partners and counselling in how to do so
Simple patient referral
Index patients receive help in identifying and naming partners and are counselled about notification
Choice patient referral or provider referral
Index patients receive help in identifying and naming partners and are counselled about notification. Outreach team notify those partners the patient does not want to notify themselves, without revealing the identity of index patient
Outcomes Primary outcome
  • Partners elicited


Secondary outcomes
  • Partners tested

  • Partners testing positive

  • Domestic violence

  • Suicide

Notes This study is still ongoing, and apart from limited data on patient preferences, there are no data on other outcomes
The only study conducted outside of the formal health services
Harms are being compared

HIV: human immunodeficiency virus.