| Methods |
Randomised, parallel‐arm trial comparing transdermal scopolamine with oral antiemetic dimenhydrinate for the prevention of motion sickness |
| Participants |
20 volunteers (15 male, 5 female) aged 20 to 47 years with proven motion sickness |
| Interventions |
Transdermal scopolamine or oral dimenhydrinate taken prior to a 1‐hour flight |
| Outcomes |
Subjective assessment of therapeutic effectiveness
Incidence of adverse effects (tiredness, dry mouth, mouth dryness) |
| Notes |
Schulz rating: randomisation B; allocation concealment A; selection bias B; blinding A |
| Risk of bias |
| Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Low risk |
A ‐ Adequate |
