Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD002280. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002280.pub2

2. Random‐effects metaregression analyses of prevented fractions: D(M)FS.

Objective Characteristic Number of trials Slope estimate 95% CI Slope interpretation P value I2 residual variation for heterogeneity
(2) Mean baseline caries 23 1.15% (‐0.97% to 3.26%) Increase per unit increase in mean baseline caries DM(F)S 0.27 82%
(3) Fluoridated water 25 ‐4.63% (‐27.13% to 17.88%) Lower PF in presence of background water fluoridation 0.68 83%
(3) Dentifrice use 25 ‐10.01% (‐26.74% to 6.71%) Lower PF in presence of dentifrice use 0.23 81%
(3) Any background fluorides 25 ‐10.65% (‐25.86% to 4.56%) Lower PF in presence of other fluorides 0.16 81%
(4) Self versus operator application 25 8.17% (‐7.99% to 24.33%) Higher PF if self applied 0.31 81%
(4) Paint or tray versus toothbrush or floss application 25 3.79% (‐16.99% to 24.56%) Higher PF with tray 0.71 83%
(5) Frequency of application > twice per year 25 6.33% (‐9.48% to 22.14%) Higher PF if application > twice per year
 
0.42 81%
(5)
 
Concentration of fluoride ≥ 10,000 ppm F 22 12.90% (‐31.48% to 5.67%) Higher PF if fluoride concentration is ≥ 10,000 ppm F
 
0.16 80%
  Placebo versus control 25 17.26% (3.24% to 31.29%) Lower PF in presence of placebo group 0.018 73%
 
  Years of follow‐up 25 ‐2.11% (‐11.50% to 7.27%) Decrease per unit increase in years follow‐up 0.65 81%
  Prior prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis 25 ‐2.48% (‐18.71% to 13.75%) Lower PF in presence of no prophylaxis 0.75 82%
  Dropouts (%) 23 ‐0.06% (‐0.67% to 0.54%) _ 0.82 82%

CI = confidence interval
D(M)FS = decayed, (missing) and filled permanent surfaces
PF = prevented fraction
ppm F = parts per million of fluoride