Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD002280. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002280.pub2

Comparison 1. Fluoride gel versus placebo or no treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1.1 D(M)FS increment ‐ nearest to 3 years (25 trials) 25 8479 Prevented Fraction (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.28 [0.19, 0.36]
1.1.1 Placebo control 15 5671 Prevented Fraction (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.21 [0.15, 0.28]
1.1.2 No‐treatment control 10 2808 Prevented Fraction (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.24, 0.52]
1.2 D(M)FT increment ‐ nearest to 3 years (10 trials) 10 3198 Prevented Fraction (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.19, 0.46]
1.2.1 Placebo control 4 1525 Prevented Fraction (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.18 [0.09, 0.27]
1.2.2 No‐treatment control 6 1673 Prevented Fraction (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.29, 0.57]
1.3 d(e/m)fs increment ‐ nearest to 3 years (3 trials) 3 1254 Prevented fraction (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.01, 0.38]
1.3.1 Placebo control 3 1254 Prevented fraction (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.01, 0.38]
1.3.2 No‐treatment control 0 0 Prevented fraction (IV, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
1.4 Signs of acute toxicity ‐ nausea, vomiting (2 trials) 2 490 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.01 [‐0.01, 0.02]
1.5 Dropouts or withdrawals 19 8695 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.89, 1.19]
1.5.1 Placebo control 11 6067 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.91, 1.22]
1.5.2 No‐treatment control 8 2628 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.73, 1.47]