Davis 2004.
| Methods | Cluster RCT
Follow up: providers: DONE patients: NOT DONE Blinded assessment: NOT CLEAR Baseline: DONE Reliable outcomes: DONE Protection against contamination: DONE Overall quality: MODERATE |
|
| Participants | General practitioners from 68 practices in 53 locations with 1133 of their patients
Country: Scotland
Proportion of eligible providers who participated: 91%
General practice Academic/Teaching setting: NOT CLEAR Type of targeted behaviour: GENERAL MANAGEMENT OF A PROBLEM (epilepsy care) Complexity of targeted behaviour: MEDIUM |
|
| Interventions | 1. CME intensive: postal dissemination of guideline + interactive, accredited workshops + dedicated structured protocol documents (tool to be used in patient treatment) + the services of a nurse specialist in epilepsy: who offered advice and training to practices in establishing epilepsy review programs, promoted the use of the guideline in epilepsy management and provided information on epilepsy for both practitioners and patients 2. CME intermediate: postal dissemination of guideline + interactive, accredited workshops + dedicated structured protocol documents (tool to be used in patient treatment) 3. Postal dissemination of a nationally developed guideline | |
| Outcomes | Professional practice: process of care data Patient: SF‐36 general health related quality of life measures Seriousness of outcome: HIGH | |
| Notes | Data on professional outcomes could not be extracted, only patient outcomes | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |