Kottke 1989.
Methods | Cluster RCT
Follow up:
providers: DONE
patients: NOT CLEAR
Blinded assessment: NOT CLEAR
Baseline: NOT DONE
Reliable outcomes: NOT CLEAR
Protection against contamination: DONE Overall quality: LOW |
|
Participants | 66 doctors general/family practices providing smoking cessation interventions for 1653 patients Country: USA Proportion of eligible providers who participated: 6% General practice Academic/Teaching setting: NOT CLEAR Type of targeted behaviour: PREVENTIVE CARE (smoking counselling) Complexity of targeted behaviour: MEDIUM | |
Interventions | 1. CME: 6‐hr workshop of mixed format + 100 copies of 'Quit and win' smoking cessation manual for patients 2. 100 copies of 'Quit and win' smoking cessation manual for patients 3. No intervention control | |
Outcomes | Professional practice: patients' reports of smoking cessation counselling behaviours Patient: number of patients smoking after 1 year Seriousness of outcome: MODERATE | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | D ‐ Not used |